A Theory of Predictive Dissonance

Predictive Processing Presents a New Take on Cognitive Dissonance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article is a comparative study between predictive processing (PP, or predictive coding) and cognitive dissonance (CD) theory. The theory of CD, one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology, is shown to be highly compatible with recent developments in PP. This is particularly evident in the notion that both theories deal with strategies to reduce perceived error signals. However, reasons exist to update the theory of CD to one of “predictive dissonance.” First, the hierarchical PP framework can be helpful in understanding varying nested levels of CD. If dissonance arises from a cascade of downstream and lateral predictions and consequent prediction errors, dissonance can exist at a multitude of scales, all the way up from sensory perception to higher order cognitions. This helps understand the previously problematic dichotomy between “dissonant cognitive relations” and “dissonant psychological states,” which are part of the same perception-action process while still hierarchically distinct. Second, since PP is action-oriented, it can be read to support recent action-based models of CD. Third, PP can potentially help us understand the recently speculated evolutionary origins of CD. Here, the argument is that responses to CD can instill meta-learning which serves to prevent the overfitting of generative models to ephemeral local conditions. This can increase action-oriented ecological rationality and enhanced capabilities to interact with a rich landscape of affordances. The downside is that in today’s world where social institutions such as science a priori separate noise from signal, some reactions to predictive dissonance might propagate ecologically unsound (underfitted, confirmation-biased) mental models such as climate denialism.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2218
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Number of pages15
ISSN1664-1078
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 515 Psychology
  • Predictive processing
  • predictive coding
  • cognitive dissonance
  • affordance theory
  • ecological rationality
  • Cultural evolution
  • ACTIVE INFERENCE
  • FREE-ENERGY
  • affordances
  • AUTISM
  • PRIORS
  • BRAIN
  • 5144 Social psychology
  • 6162 Cognitive science

Cite this

@article{6141e1fb24c24432a544d39034d05227,
title = "A Theory of Predictive Dissonance: Predictive Processing Presents a New Take on Cognitive Dissonance",
abstract = "This article is a comparative study between predictive processing (PP, or predictive coding) and cognitive dissonance (CD) theory. The theory of CD, one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology, is shown to be highly compatible with recent developments in PP. This is particularly evident in the notion that both theories deal with strategies to reduce perceived error signals. However, reasons exist to update the theory of CD to one of “predictive dissonance.” First, the hierarchical PP framework can be helpful in understanding varying nested levels of CD. If dissonance arises from a cascade of downstream and lateral predictions and consequent prediction errors, dissonance can exist at a multitude of scales, all the way up from sensory perception to higher order cognitions. This helps understand the previously problematic dichotomy between “dissonant cognitive relations” and “dissonant psychological states,” which are part of the same perception-action process while still hierarchically distinct. Second, since PP is action-oriented, it can be read to support recent action-based models of CD. Third, PP can potentially help us understand the recently speculated evolutionary origins of CD. Here, the argument is that responses to CD can instill meta-learning which serves to prevent the overfitting of generative models to ephemeral local conditions. This can increase action-oriented ecological rationality and enhanced capabilities to interact with a rich landscape of affordances. The downside is that in today’s world where social institutions such as science a priori separate noise from signal, some reactions to predictive dissonance might propagate ecologically unsound (underfitted, confirmation-biased) mental models such as climate denialism.",
keywords = "515 Psychology, Predictive processing, predictive coding, cognitive dissonance, affordance theory, ecological rationality, Cultural evolution, ACTIVE INFERENCE, FREE-ENERGY, affordances, AUTISM, PRIORS, BRAIN, 5144 Social psychology, 6162 Cognitive science",
author = "Kaaronen, {Roope Oskari}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02218",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",

}

A Theory of Predictive Dissonance : Predictive Processing Presents a New Take on Cognitive Dissonance. / Kaaronen, Roope Oskari.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, 2218, 19.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Theory of Predictive Dissonance

T2 - Predictive Processing Presents a New Take on Cognitive Dissonance

AU - Kaaronen, Roope Oskari

PY - 2018/11/19

Y1 - 2018/11/19

N2 - This article is a comparative study between predictive processing (PP, or predictive coding) and cognitive dissonance (CD) theory. The theory of CD, one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology, is shown to be highly compatible with recent developments in PP. This is particularly evident in the notion that both theories deal with strategies to reduce perceived error signals. However, reasons exist to update the theory of CD to one of “predictive dissonance.” First, the hierarchical PP framework can be helpful in understanding varying nested levels of CD. If dissonance arises from a cascade of downstream and lateral predictions and consequent prediction errors, dissonance can exist at a multitude of scales, all the way up from sensory perception to higher order cognitions. This helps understand the previously problematic dichotomy between “dissonant cognitive relations” and “dissonant psychological states,” which are part of the same perception-action process while still hierarchically distinct. Second, since PP is action-oriented, it can be read to support recent action-based models of CD. Third, PP can potentially help us understand the recently speculated evolutionary origins of CD. Here, the argument is that responses to CD can instill meta-learning which serves to prevent the overfitting of generative models to ephemeral local conditions. This can increase action-oriented ecological rationality and enhanced capabilities to interact with a rich landscape of affordances. The downside is that in today’s world where social institutions such as science a priori separate noise from signal, some reactions to predictive dissonance might propagate ecologically unsound (underfitted, confirmation-biased) mental models such as climate denialism.

AB - This article is a comparative study between predictive processing (PP, or predictive coding) and cognitive dissonance (CD) theory. The theory of CD, one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology, is shown to be highly compatible with recent developments in PP. This is particularly evident in the notion that both theories deal with strategies to reduce perceived error signals. However, reasons exist to update the theory of CD to one of “predictive dissonance.” First, the hierarchical PP framework can be helpful in understanding varying nested levels of CD. If dissonance arises from a cascade of downstream and lateral predictions and consequent prediction errors, dissonance can exist at a multitude of scales, all the way up from sensory perception to higher order cognitions. This helps understand the previously problematic dichotomy between “dissonant cognitive relations” and “dissonant psychological states,” which are part of the same perception-action process while still hierarchically distinct. Second, since PP is action-oriented, it can be read to support recent action-based models of CD. Third, PP can potentially help us understand the recently speculated evolutionary origins of CD. Here, the argument is that responses to CD can instill meta-learning which serves to prevent the overfitting of generative models to ephemeral local conditions. This can increase action-oriented ecological rationality and enhanced capabilities to interact with a rich landscape of affordances. The downside is that in today’s world where social institutions such as science a priori separate noise from signal, some reactions to predictive dissonance might propagate ecologically unsound (underfitted, confirmation-biased) mental models such as climate denialism.

KW - 515 Psychology

KW - Predictive processing

KW - predictive coding

KW - cognitive dissonance

KW - affordance theory

KW - ecological rationality

KW - Cultural evolution

KW - ACTIVE INFERENCE

KW - FREE-ENERGY

KW - affordances

KW - AUTISM

KW - PRIORS

KW - BRAIN

KW - 5144 Social psychology

KW - 6162 Cognitive science

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02218

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02218

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 2218

ER -