Active and latent social groups and their interactional expertise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

As a part of their normative theory of expertise, Harry Collins and Robert Evans proposed that interactional expertise forms the third kind of knowledge, located between formal propositional knowledge and embodied skills. Interactional expertise refers to the capability to grasp the conceptual structure of another’s social world, and it is expressed as the ability to speak fluently the language spoken in that social world. According to their theory, it is a key concept of sociology, because it refers to the understanding and coordination of joint actions between members of different social groups. Collins and Evans have further claimed that minority social group members tend to outpace majority social group members in terms of interactional expertise. Drawing on ethnomethodology, we detail the ways in which interactional expertise is displayed and revealed in experiments. This allowed us to specify the underlying reasons for the distribution of interactional expertise between social groups. Our results indicate that the difference between the groups depends on whether a group is either actively maintained or a passive latent category, because interactional expertise provides for not only the crossing of social boundaries but also their maintenance. The minority social group members’ greater interactional expertise or competence is therefore proven to be illusory.
Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Sociologica
Volume62
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)391-405
Number of pages15
ISSN0001-6993
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 5141 Sociology
  • 614 Theology
  • 113 Computer and information sciences

Cite this

@article{64ec6015f03a4057b9988ca1a86d9b87,
title = "Active and latent social groups and their interactional expertise",
abstract = "As a part of their normative theory of expertise, Harry Collins and Robert Evans proposed that interactional expertise forms the third kind of knowledge, located between formal propositional knowledge and embodied skills. Interactional expertise refers to the capability to grasp the conceptual structure of another’s social world, and it is expressed as the ability to speak fluently the language spoken in that social world. According to their theory, it is a key concept of sociology, because it refers to the understanding and coordination of joint actions between members of different social groups. Collins and Evans have further claimed that minority social group members tend to outpace majority social group members in terms of interactional expertise. Drawing on ethnomethodology, we detail the ways in which interactional expertise is displayed and revealed in experiments. This allowed us to specify the underlying reasons for the distribution of interactional expertise between social groups. Our results indicate that the difference between the groups depends on whether a group is either actively maintained or a passive latent category, because interactional expertise provides for not only the crossing of social boundaries but also their maintenance. The minority social group members’ greater interactional expertise or competence is therefore proven to be illusory.",
keywords = "5141 Sociology, 614 Theology, 113 Computer and information sciences",
author = "Ilkka Arminen and Segersven, {Otto Erik Alexander} and Mika Simonen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0001699318786361",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "391--405",
journal = "Acta Sociologica",
issn = "0001-6993",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd STM",
number = "4",

}

Active and latent social groups and their interactional expertise. / Arminen, Ilkka; Segersven, Otto Erik Alexander; Simonen, Mika.

In: Acta Sociologica, Vol. 62, No. 4, 2019, p. 391-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Active and latent social groups and their interactional expertise

AU - Arminen, Ilkka

AU - Segersven, Otto Erik Alexander

AU - Simonen, Mika

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - As a part of their normative theory of expertise, Harry Collins and Robert Evans proposed that interactional expertise forms the third kind of knowledge, located between formal propositional knowledge and embodied skills. Interactional expertise refers to the capability to grasp the conceptual structure of another’s social world, and it is expressed as the ability to speak fluently the language spoken in that social world. According to their theory, it is a key concept of sociology, because it refers to the understanding and coordination of joint actions between members of different social groups. Collins and Evans have further claimed that minority social group members tend to outpace majority social group members in terms of interactional expertise. Drawing on ethnomethodology, we detail the ways in which interactional expertise is displayed and revealed in experiments. This allowed us to specify the underlying reasons for the distribution of interactional expertise between social groups. Our results indicate that the difference between the groups depends on whether a group is either actively maintained or a passive latent category, because interactional expertise provides for not only the crossing of social boundaries but also their maintenance. The minority social group members’ greater interactional expertise or competence is therefore proven to be illusory.

AB - As a part of their normative theory of expertise, Harry Collins and Robert Evans proposed that interactional expertise forms the third kind of knowledge, located between formal propositional knowledge and embodied skills. Interactional expertise refers to the capability to grasp the conceptual structure of another’s social world, and it is expressed as the ability to speak fluently the language spoken in that social world. According to their theory, it is a key concept of sociology, because it refers to the understanding and coordination of joint actions between members of different social groups. Collins and Evans have further claimed that minority social group members tend to outpace majority social group members in terms of interactional expertise. Drawing on ethnomethodology, we detail the ways in which interactional expertise is displayed and revealed in experiments. This allowed us to specify the underlying reasons for the distribution of interactional expertise between social groups. Our results indicate that the difference between the groups depends on whether a group is either actively maintained or a passive latent category, because interactional expertise provides for not only the crossing of social boundaries but also their maintenance. The minority social group members’ greater interactional expertise or competence is therefore proven to be illusory.

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - 614 Theology

KW - 113 Computer and information sciences

U2 - 10.1177/0001699318786361

DO - 10.1177/0001699318786361

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 391

EP - 405

JO - Acta Sociologica

JF - Acta Sociologica

SN - 0001-6993

IS - 4

ER -