TY - JOUR
T1 - American mink as an animal model to study SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine response
AU - Aaltonen, Kirsi
AU - Virtanen, Jenni
AU - Kegler, Kristel
AU - Venkat, Vinaya
AU - Kareinen, Lauri
AU - Korhonen, Essi M.
AU - Niamsap, Thanakorn
AU - Malmgren, Rasmus
AU - Korpela, Johanna
AU - Naves, Rauno A.
AU - Iso-Oja, Maarit
AU - Svenns, Sofie
AU - Häggvik, Tomas
AU - Ojala, Eeva
AU - Vapalahti, Olli
AU - Peura, Jussi
AU - Sukura, Antti
AU - Ritvos, Olli
AU - Pasternack, Arja
AU - Nordgren, Heli
AU - Kant, Ravi
AU - Sironen, Tarja
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Selecting a suitable animal model is crucial in understanding infectious diseases and developing vaccines. Here, we developed a receptor-binding domain -based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with mouse Fc an immunopotentiator in a mink model. Four different variations of the vaccine were tested in groups of 30-31 American mink and followed for IgG and neutralizing antibodies (nAb) up to 27 weeks. Subcutaneous version induced a strong IgG and nAb response within two weeks and was still detectable at 27 weeks. Intranasal version also caused a detectable, although weaker, immune response. A simultaneously given subcutaneous vaccine against virus enteritis, botulism and hemorrhagic pneumonia potentially caused a lower SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, highlighting the need for further studies on co-effects of vaccines. In virus challenge with Alpha variant (B.1.1.7), vaccinated mink had a stronger antibody response than unvaccinated mink. Despite not preventing the infection, vaccinated mink had milder clinical signs and less virus in saliva. Another challenge of unvaccinated mink with Omicron variant showed similar results to alpha (BA.1) variant. Virus RNA was detected in the brain of unvaccinated mink but not vaccinated mink by in situ hybridization, indicating a suitability of mink to study neurological effects of SARS-CoV-2 and potentially long COVID as well.Author summary Finding a good animal model is very important in studying infectious diseases and their treatment. The recent SARS-CoV2 pandemic highlighted this dilemma. We have developed an animal model based on mink due to their close match to humans in the symptomology of this disease. Such model will enable the study of relative susceptibility, transmission, tissue tropism, complex pathogenesis and long COVID, as well as prophylaxis and vaccines. This model will also help reduce the use of primates in this research.We have further developed a new vaccine for SARS-CoV2 based on the receptor binding domain of the S-protein with an inbuilt immune-enhancer. This vaccine underwent extensive testing in mink to determine response, long term protection, and safety. The vaccine was found to provide excellent titers of neutralizing antibodies with wide range in target variants. It also reduced the severity and duration of visible symptoms in the animals significantly. We propose this vaccine candidate for further study and future commercialization.Competing Interest StatementJussi Peura and Johanna Korpela are employed by FIFUR, which might have future economic interests in relation to the vaccine. FIFUR had no say in the results or interpretation nor in their publication.All the data is available in the manuscript or its online supplementary material.Research council of Finland, 339510Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, https://ror.org/00ckakm23VEOtextendashEuropean Union’s Horizon 2020 funding, 874735Business Finland, https://ror.org/05bgf9v38, 4917/31/2021Reino Rinne FoundationFinnish Fur Breeders’ AssociationFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, https://ror.org/03tf0c761
AB - Selecting a suitable animal model is crucial in understanding infectious diseases and developing vaccines. Here, we developed a receptor-binding domain -based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with mouse Fc an immunopotentiator in a mink model. Four different variations of the vaccine were tested in groups of 30-31 American mink and followed for IgG and neutralizing antibodies (nAb) up to 27 weeks. Subcutaneous version induced a strong IgG and nAb response within two weeks and was still detectable at 27 weeks. Intranasal version also caused a detectable, although weaker, immune response. A simultaneously given subcutaneous vaccine against virus enteritis, botulism and hemorrhagic pneumonia potentially caused a lower SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, highlighting the need for further studies on co-effects of vaccines. In virus challenge with Alpha variant (B.1.1.7), vaccinated mink had a stronger antibody response than unvaccinated mink. Despite not preventing the infection, vaccinated mink had milder clinical signs and less virus in saliva. Another challenge of unvaccinated mink with Omicron variant showed similar results to alpha (BA.1) variant. Virus RNA was detected in the brain of unvaccinated mink but not vaccinated mink by in situ hybridization, indicating a suitability of mink to study neurological effects of SARS-CoV-2 and potentially long COVID as well.Author summary Finding a good animal model is very important in studying infectious diseases and their treatment. The recent SARS-CoV2 pandemic highlighted this dilemma. We have developed an animal model based on mink due to their close match to humans in the symptomology of this disease. Such model will enable the study of relative susceptibility, transmission, tissue tropism, complex pathogenesis and long COVID, as well as prophylaxis and vaccines. This model will also help reduce the use of primates in this research.We have further developed a new vaccine for SARS-CoV2 based on the receptor binding domain of the S-protein with an inbuilt immune-enhancer. This vaccine underwent extensive testing in mink to determine response, long term protection, and safety. The vaccine was found to provide excellent titers of neutralizing antibodies with wide range in target variants. It also reduced the severity and duration of visible symptoms in the animals significantly. We propose this vaccine candidate for further study and future commercialization.Competing Interest StatementJussi Peura and Johanna Korpela are employed by FIFUR, which might have future economic interests in relation to the vaccine. FIFUR had no say in the results or interpretation nor in their publication.All the data is available in the manuscript or its online supplementary material.Research council of Finland, 339510Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, https://ror.org/00ckakm23VEOtextendashEuropean Union’s Horizon 2020 funding, 874735Business Finland, https://ror.org/05bgf9v38, 4917/31/2021Reino Rinne FoundationFinnish Fur Breeders’ AssociationFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, https://ror.org/03tf0c761
U2 - 10.1101/2025.06.10.658224
DO - 10.1101/2025.06.10.658224
M3 - Article
JO - bioRxiv
JF - bioRxiv
ER -