Balancing between Russia and the West: the hard security choice of Armenia

Arthur V. Atanesyan, Bradley M. Reynolds, Arthur E. Mkrtichyan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Armenia’s official foreign policy of complementarism aims to sustain national security and development by balancing strategic and friendly relations with Russia, while also engaging in multilevel political, economic and cultural interactions with the EU and the USA. However, after the 2020 Karabakh War and amidst the increasing confrontation between the West and Russia, complementarism faced unprecedented challenges. To investigate whether Armenian elites still adhere to the line of complementarism and to determine whether they reflect or contradict public perceptions of foreign policy, we gathered novel sociological data on foreign policy preferences in Armenian society through a nationwide survey, outlining changes and continuities in their perceptions over the past ten years. Our study reveals that Armenian elites have started to modify complementarism as they began to doubt Russia’s role in Armenian foreign policy, particularly in the context of the European neighbourhood. Armenian society’s trust in Russia has consistently declined, despite Moscow still being ranked as the main strategic ally in public perceptions. The misbalancing of complementarism by Armenian elites not only challenges Russia’s role in Armenian security and public opinion but also offers no viable alternative for the security of Armenia and the Armenian population in Karabakh.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Security
Pages (from-to)261-283
Number of pages23
ISSN0966-2839
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Sept 2023
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 5171 Political Science
  • Armenian society
  • Complementarism
  • Karabakh War
  • Russia
  • Security priorities
  • The West

Cite this