Becoming (a) public: What the concept of public reveals about a programmatic public pedagogy at the university

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article extends the ongoing argumentation of 'public', publics and universities by providing a conceptual discussion of issues at the core of the public sphere: how does public form and exist amid private and individual life and pursuits, and how does a collective public body identify itself. The discussion is placed in dialogue with two earlier contributions to 'becoming (a) public' by Simons and Masschelein (European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 204-217, 2009) and Biesta (Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 683-697, 2012). Brought together, these contributions constitute a definition of a programmatic public pedagogy at the university. This article develops the definition of a programmatic public pedagogy by drawing on the conceptual core meanings of public in continental antiquity, Enlightenment and American pragmatism. The author discusses public as (1) indefinitely circulating discourses, (2) sociability between strangers, (3) macro structures and (4) the political public sphere. The article reveals that the 'becoming (a) public' extends and occurs across a broad spectrum, and that the discursive and sociable manifestations of public are not secondary to explicitly political action but have an inherent value in themselves. The article distinguishes the character of public as constant openness to the emergence of what is yet not known from interpretations that locate public in the existing structures, ideologies and forms of action. The dialogue with Simons and Masschelein and Biesta shows that this distinction has critical implications on how programmatic public pedagogy is understood at the university.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHigher Education
Volume75
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1015-1029
Number of pages15
ISSN0018-1560
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 518 Media and communications
  • PUBLIC SPHERE
  • PUBLIC SPACE
  • Public participation
  • CITIZENSHIP
  • 516 Educational sciences
  • Education
  • public pedagogy
  • UNIVERSITY
  • HIGHER-EDUCATION

Cite this

@article{2a09e1906d964f178ca4cb8d2a1dbcd6,
title = "Becoming (a) public: What the concept of public reveals about a programmatic public pedagogy at the university",
abstract = "This article extends the ongoing argumentation of 'public', publics and universities by providing a conceptual discussion of issues at the core of the public sphere: how does public form and exist amid private and individual life and pursuits, and how does a collective public body identify itself. The discussion is placed in dialogue with two earlier contributions to 'becoming (a) public' by Simons and Masschelein (European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 204-217, 2009) and Biesta (Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 683-697, 2012). Brought together, these contributions constitute a definition of a programmatic public pedagogy at the university. This article develops the definition of a programmatic public pedagogy by drawing on the conceptual core meanings of public in continental antiquity, Enlightenment and American pragmatism. The author discusses public as (1) indefinitely circulating discourses, (2) sociability between strangers, (3) macro structures and (4) the political public sphere. The article reveals that the 'becoming (a) public' extends and occurs across a broad spectrum, and that the discursive and sociable manifestations of public are not secondary to explicitly political action but have an inherent value in themselves. The article distinguishes the character of public as constant openness to the emergence of what is yet not known from interpretations that locate public in the existing structures, ideologies and forms of action. The dialogue with Simons and Masschelein and Biesta shows that this distinction has critical implications on how programmatic public pedagogy is understood at the university.",
keywords = "518 Media and communications, PUBLIC SPHERE, PUBLIC SPACE, Public participation, CITIZENSHIP, PUBLIC SPHERE, PUBLIC SPACE, Public participation, CITIZENSHIP, 516 Educational sciences, Education, public pedagogy, UNIVERSITY, HIGHER-EDUCATION, EDUCATION, public pedagogy, UNIVERSITY, higher education",
author = "Leena Ripatti-Torniainen",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10734-017-0182-5",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "1015--1029",
journal = "Higher Education",
issn = "0018-1560",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

Becoming (a) public : What the concept of public reveals about a programmatic public pedagogy at the university. / Ripatti-Torniainen, Leena.

In: Higher Education, Vol. 75, No. 6, 06.2018, p. 1015-1029.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Becoming (a) public

T2 - What the concept of public reveals about a programmatic public pedagogy at the university

AU - Ripatti-Torniainen, Leena

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - This article extends the ongoing argumentation of 'public', publics and universities by providing a conceptual discussion of issues at the core of the public sphere: how does public form and exist amid private and individual life and pursuits, and how does a collective public body identify itself. The discussion is placed in dialogue with two earlier contributions to 'becoming (a) public' by Simons and Masschelein (European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 204-217, 2009) and Biesta (Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 683-697, 2012). Brought together, these contributions constitute a definition of a programmatic public pedagogy at the university. This article develops the definition of a programmatic public pedagogy by drawing on the conceptual core meanings of public in continental antiquity, Enlightenment and American pragmatism. The author discusses public as (1) indefinitely circulating discourses, (2) sociability between strangers, (3) macro structures and (4) the political public sphere. The article reveals that the 'becoming (a) public' extends and occurs across a broad spectrum, and that the discursive and sociable manifestations of public are not secondary to explicitly political action but have an inherent value in themselves. The article distinguishes the character of public as constant openness to the emergence of what is yet not known from interpretations that locate public in the existing structures, ideologies and forms of action. The dialogue with Simons and Masschelein and Biesta shows that this distinction has critical implications on how programmatic public pedagogy is understood at the university.

AB - This article extends the ongoing argumentation of 'public', publics and universities by providing a conceptual discussion of issues at the core of the public sphere: how does public form and exist amid private and individual life and pursuits, and how does a collective public body identify itself. The discussion is placed in dialogue with two earlier contributions to 'becoming (a) public' by Simons and Masschelein (European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 204-217, 2009) and Biesta (Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 683-697, 2012). Brought together, these contributions constitute a definition of a programmatic public pedagogy at the university. This article develops the definition of a programmatic public pedagogy by drawing on the conceptual core meanings of public in continental antiquity, Enlightenment and American pragmatism. The author discusses public as (1) indefinitely circulating discourses, (2) sociability between strangers, (3) macro structures and (4) the political public sphere. The article reveals that the 'becoming (a) public' extends and occurs across a broad spectrum, and that the discursive and sociable manifestations of public are not secondary to explicitly political action but have an inherent value in themselves. The article distinguishes the character of public as constant openness to the emergence of what is yet not known from interpretations that locate public in the existing structures, ideologies and forms of action. The dialogue with Simons and Masschelein and Biesta shows that this distinction has critical implications on how programmatic public pedagogy is understood at the university.

KW - 518 Media and communications

KW - PUBLIC SPHERE

KW - PUBLIC SPACE

KW - Public participation

KW - CITIZENSHIP

KW - PUBLIC SPHERE

KW - PUBLIC SPACE

KW - Public participation

KW - CITIZENSHIP

KW - 516 Educational sciences

KW - Education

KW - public pedagogy

KW - UNIVERSITY

KW - HIGHER-EDUCATION

KW - EDUCATION

KW - public pedagogy

KW - UNIVERSITY

KW - higher education

U2 - 10.1007/s10734-017-0182-5

DO - 10.1007/s10734-017-0182-5

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 1015

EP - 1029

JO - Higher Education

JF - Higher Education

SN - 0018-1560

IS - 6

ER -