Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness: The case of Roma and falling in-between

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The categories emanating from international human rights law defining the belonging of peoples to different types of minorities invites for a re-assessment. These different minority categories such as indigenous peoples, national (historical) minorities and migrants tend to fix people to different types or levels of specific protection. The justifications for different treatment are, however, not born in a vacuum or value-free, and they rarely fit seamlessly with real life cases of needs of minorities. Thus, in this article I shall discuss the legitimacy and consequences of the current typology, which divides minorities into different categories. This categorization has direct consequences for the rights people can claim vis-à-vis their governments and the international community. To illustrate the key concerns with the contemporary categorization of minorities, this article presents the case of Roma and their current struggles to fit their claims and needs into the existing minority rights framework.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExtending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe : Old and New Minorities
EditorsRoberta Medda-Windischer, Caitlin Boulter, Tove H. Malloy
Number of pages24
Volume1
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Publication date16 Jul 2019
Edition1
Pages65-88
Article number4
ISBN (Print)978-1-138-59072-4
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-429-49086-6
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2019
MoE publication typeA3 Book chapter

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration
PublisherRoutledge
Volume8

Fields of Science

  • 5141 Sociology
  • 517 Political science

Cite this

Toivanen, R. (2019). Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness: The case of Roma and falling in-between. In R. Medda-Windischer, C. Boulter, & T. H. Malloy (Eds.), Extending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe: Old and New Minorities (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 65-88). [4] (Routledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration; Vol. 8). London: Routledge.
Toivanen, Reetta. / Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness : The case of Roma and falling in-between. Extending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe: Old and New Minorities. editor / Roberta Medda-Windischer ; Caitlin Boulter ; Tove H. Malloy. Vol. 1 1. ed. London : Routledge, 2019. pp. 65-88 (Routledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration).
@inbook{94a56286bef747dca3c0764d977ccccb,
title = "Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness: The case of Roma and falling in-between",
abstract = "The categories emanating from international human rights law defining the belonging of peoples to different types of minorities invites for a re-assessment. These different minority categories such as indigenous peoples, national (historical) minorities and migrants tend to fix people to different types or levels of specific protection. The justifications for different treatment are, however, not born in a vacuum or value-free, and they rarely fit seamlessly with real life cases of needs of minorities. Thus, in this article I shall discuss the legitimacy and consequences of the current typology, which divides minorities into different categories. This categorization has direct consequences for the rights people can claim vis-{\`a}-vis their governments and the international community. To illustrate the key concerns with the contemporary categorization of minorities, this article presents the case of Roma and their current struggles to fit their claims and needs into the existing minority rights framework.",
keywords = "5141 Sociology, 517 Political science",
author = "Reetta Toivanen",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "16",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-138-59072-4",
volume = "1",
series = "Routledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration",
publisher = "Routledge",
pages = "65--88",
editor = "Roberta Medda-Windischer and Caitlin Boulter and Malloy, {Tove H.}",
booktitle = "Extending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1",

}

Toivanen, R 2019, Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness: The case of Roma and falling in-between. in R Medda-Windischer, C Boulter & TH Malloy (eds), Extending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe: Old and New Minorities. 1 edn, vol. 1, 4, Routledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration, vol. 8, Routledge, London, pp. 65-88.

Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness : The case of Roma and falling in-between. / Toivanen, Reetta.

Extending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe: Old and New Minorities. ed. / Roberta Medda-Windischer; Caitlin Boulter; Tove H. Malloy. Vol. 1 1. ed. London : Routledge, 2019. p. 65-88 4 (Routledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration; Vol. 8).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness

T2 - The case of Roma and falling in-between

AU - Toivanen, Reetta

PY - 2019/7/16

Y1 - 2019/7/16

N2 - The categories emanating from international human rights law defining the belonging of peoples to different types of minorities invites for a re-assessment. These different minority categories such as indigenous peoples, national (historical) minorities and migrants tend to fix people to different types or levels of specific protection. The justifications for different treatment are, however, not born in a vacuum or value-free, and they rarely fit seamlessly with real life cases of needs of minorities. Thus, in this article I shall discuss the legitimacy and consequences of the current typology, which divides minorities into different categories. This categorization has direct consequences for the rights people can claim vis-à-vis their governments and the international community. To illustrate the key concerns with the contemporary categorization of minorities, this article presents the case of Roma and their current struggles to fit their claims and needs into the existing minority rights framework.

AB - The categories emanating from international human rights law defining the belonging of peoples to different types of minorities invites for a re-assessment. These different minority categories such as indigenous peoples, national (historical) minorities and migrants tend to fix people to different types or levels of specific protection. The justifications for different treatment are, however, not born in a vacuum or value-free, and they rarely fit seamlessly with real life cases of needs of minorities. Thus, in this article I shall discuss the legitimacy and consequences of the current typology, which divides minorities into different categories. This categorization has direct consequences for the rights people can claim vis-à-vis their governments and the international community. To illustrate the key concerns with the contemporary categorization of minorities, this article presents the case of Roma and their current struggles to fit their claims and needs into the existing minority rights framework.

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - 517 Political science

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-138-59072-4

VL - 1

T3 - Routledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration

SP - 65

EP - 88

BT - Extending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe

A2 - Medda-Windischer, Roberta

A2 - Boulter, Caitlin

A2 - Malloy, Tove H.

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -

Toivanen R. Beyond legal categories of indigeneity and minority-ness: The case of Roma and falling in-between. In Medda-Windischer R, Boulter C, Malloy TH, editors, Extending the Protection to Migrant Populations in Europe: Old and New Minorities. 1 ed. Vol. 1. London: Routledge. 2019. p. 65-88. 4. (Routledge Research on the Global Politics of Migration).