Commentary on Robin Wooffitt’s Paper “Poetic Confluence: A Sociological Analysis of an Enigmatic Moment”

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateScientific

Abstract

The author, who is a sociologist and psychoanalyst, comments upon Wooffitt’s analysis of poetic confluence. Using conversation analysis of moments of interaction where one interlocutor says something that bears a strong resemblance to what has just been in the mind of the other interlocutor, Wooffitt suggests that this form of communication has its function in the neutralization of the mental contents of this other interlocutor. In light of material presented by Schegloff in his earlier work, this appears to be a partial function of poetic confluence but not something that is there in all instances. On a conceptual level, psychoanalysis and sociology have had several moments of rapprochement in history. Wooffitt’s plea for dialogue is different: rather than focusing on conceptual linkages between the two disciplines, he proposes meeting through empirical studies of the intersubjective and interactional basis of mental phenomena.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychoanalytic Dialogues
Volume29
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)355-360
Number of pages6
ISSN1048-1885
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jun 2019
MoE publication typeB1 Journal article

Fields of Science

  • 5141 Sociology
  • psychoanalysis
  • conversation analysis
  • poetics

Cite this

@article{6bd1aa3e9b8f434d9e9cdee110d96010,
title = "Commentary on Robin Wooffitt’s Paper “Poetic Confluence: A Sociological Analysis of an Enigmatic Moment”",
abstract = "The author, who is a sociologist and psychoanalyst, comments upon Wooffitt’s analysis of poetic confluence. Using conversation analysis of moments of interaction where one interlocutor says something that bears a strong resemblance to what has just been in the mind of the other interlocutor, Wooffitt suggests that this form of communication has its function in the neutralization of the mental contents of this other interlocutor. In light of material presented by Schegloff in his earlier work, this appears to be a partial function of poetic confluence but not something that is there in all instances. On a conceptual level, psychoanalysis and sociology have had several moments of rapprochement in history. Wooffitt’s plea for dialogue is different: rather than focusing on conceptual linkages between the two disciplines, he proposes meeting through empirical studies of the intersubjective and interactional basis of mental phenomena.",
keywords = "5141 Sociology, psychoanalysis, conversation analysis, poetics",
author = "Anssi Per{\"a}kyl{\"a}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/10481885.2019.1614833",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "355--360",
journal = "Psychoanalytic Dialogues",
issn = "1048-1885",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Commentary on Robin Wooffitt’s Paper “Poetic Confluence : A Sociological Analysis of an Enigmatic Moment”. / Peräkylä, Anssi.

In: Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 29, No. 3, 08.06.2019, p. 355-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateScientific

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on Robin Wooffitt’s Paper “Poetic Confluence

T2 - A Sociological Analysis of an Enigmatic Moment”

AU - Peräkylä, Anssi

PY - 2019/6/8

Y1 - 2019/6/8

N2 - The author, who is a sociologist and psychoanalyst, comments upon Wooffitt’s analysis of poetic confluence. Using conversation analysis of moments of interaction where one interlocutor says something that bears a strong resemblance to what has just been in the mind of the other interlocutor, Wooffitt suggests that this form of communication has its function in the neutralization of the mental contents of this other interlocutor. In light of material presented by Schegloff in his earlier work, this appears to be a partial function of poetic confluence but not something that is there in all instances. On a conceptual level, psychoanalysis and sociology have had several moments of rapprochement in history. Wooffitt’s plea for dialogue is different: rather than focusing on conceptual linkages between the two disciplines, he proposes meeting through empirical studies of the intersubjective and interactional basis of mental phenomena.

AB - The author, who is a sociologist and psychoanalyst, comments upon Wooffitt’s analysis of poetic confluence. Using conversation analysis of moments of interaction where one interlocutor says something that bears a strong resemblance to what has just been in the mind of the other interlocutor, Wooffitt suggests that this form of communication has its function in the neutralization of the mental contents of this other interlocutor. In light of material presented by Schegloff in his earlier work, this appears to be a partial function of poetic confluence but not something that is there in all instances. On a conceptual level, psychoanalysis and sociology have had several moments of rapprochement in history. Wooffitt’s plea for dialogue is different: rather than focusing on conceptual linkages between the two disciplines, he proposes meeting through empirical studies of the intersubjective and interactional basis of mental phenomena.

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - psychoanalysis

KW - conversation analysis

KW - poetics

U2 - 10.1080/10481885.2019.1614833

DO - 10.1080/10481885.2019.1614833

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 29

SP - 355

EP - 360

JO - Psychoanalytic Dialogues

JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues

SN - 1048-1885

IS - 3

ER -