Defenestration: deconstructing the frame-in relation in Ungarinyin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin (Worrorran) has one single complex-clause construction for expressing reported speech (`say'), that can also signal reported thought (`think') and attribute intentions (`want'). By demonstrating which formal and functional distinctions are essential to the interpretation of this Ungarinyin construction, the present paper aims to contribute to understanding the exact nature of the syntactic relation involved in reported speech constructions. Following the account of McGregor (1994; 1997; 2008), I analyse the clausal syntax of reported speech constructions as a dedicated syntactic relation, separate from more familiar clausal relations such as coordination and subordination. I call this relation the `frame-in' construction. Subsequently, I compare the conventionalised reported speech construction in Ungarinyin to a variety of more loosely integrated non-conventionalised or semi-conventionalised strategies for expressing speech and thought attribution in the language. Collectively I refer to these strategies as examples of `defenestration', constructions without the typical marking of the syntactic frame-in relation, while expressing the meaning associated with a regular frame-in construction. Instances of defenestration differ from syntactic frame-in in that they express the meaning of a frame-in construction through transparent compositional means. I argue that types of defenestration show remarkable regularities in Ungarinyin, and, tentatively, crosslinguistically, which has consequences for the analysis of indexicality and iconicity in syntax and presents a new context for analysing the syntax of reported speech constructions in relation to multimodal features, particulary for the category of free (in)direct speech and `zero quotatives'.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pragmatics
Pages104-133
Number of pages29
ISSN0378-2166
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Cite this

@article{5bf15a81ecbe4781815ca164cd7169e6,
title = "Defenestration: deconstructing the frame-in relation in Ungarinyin",
abstract = "The Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin (Worrorran) has one single complex-clause construction for expressing reported speech (`say'), that can also signal reported thought (`think') and attribute intentions (`want'). By demonstrating which formal and functional distinctions are essential to the interpretation of this Ungarinyin construction, the present paper aims to contribute to understanding the exact nature of the syntactic relation involved in reported speech constructions. Following the account of McGregor (1994; 1997; 2008), I analyse the clausal syntax of reported speech constructions as a dedicated syntactic relation, separate from more familiar clausal relations such as coordination and subordination. I call this relation the `frame-in' construction. Subsequently, I compare the conventionalised reported speech construction in Ungarinyin to a variety of more loosely integrated non-conventionalised or semi-conventionalised strategies for expressing speech and thought attribution in the language. Collectively I refer to these strategies as examples of `defenestration', constructions without the typical marking of the syntactic frame-in relation, while expressing the meaning associated with a regular frame-in construction. Instances of defenestration differ from syntactic frame-in in that they express the meaning of a frame-in construction through transparent compositional means. I argue that types of defenestration show remarkable regularities in Ungarinyin, and, tentatively, crosslinguistically, which has consequences for the analysis of indexicality and iconicity in syntax and presents a new context for analysing the syntax of reported speech constructions in relation to multimodal features, particulary for the category of free (in)direct speech and `zero quotatives'.",
author = "Marie-Stephan Spronck",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.016",
language = "English",
pages = "104--133",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co",

}

Defenestration : deconstructing the frame-in relation in Ungarinyin. / Spronck, Marie-Stephan.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, 2017, p. 104-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defenestration

T2 - Journal of Pragmatics

AU - Spronck, Marie-Stephan

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin (Worrorran) has one single complex-clause construction for expressing reported speech (`say'), that can also signal reported thought (`think') and attribute intentions (`want'). By demonstrating which formal and functional distinctions are essential to the interpretation of this Ungarinyin construction, the present paper aims to contribute to understanding the exact nature of the syntactic relation involved in reported speech constructions. Following the account of McGregor (1994; 1997; 2008), I analyse the clausal syntax of reported speech constructions as a dedicated syntactic relation, separate from more familiar clausal relations such as coordination and subordination. I call this relation the `frame-in' construction. Subsequently, I compare the conventionalised reported speech construction in Ungarinyin to a variety of more loosely integrated non-conventionalised or semi-conventionalised strategies for expressing speech and thought attribution in the language. Collectively I refer to these strategies as examples of `defenestration', constructions without the typical marking of the syntactic frame-in relation, while expressing the meaning associated with a regular frame-in construction. Instances of defenestration differ from syntactic frame-in in that they express the meaning of a frame-in construction through transparent compositional means. I argue that types of defenestration show remarkable regularities in Ungarinyin, and, tentatively, crosslinguistically, which has consequences for the analysis of indexicality and iconicity in syntax and presents a new context for analysing the syntax of reported speech constructions in relation to multimodal features, particulary for the category of free (in)direct speech and `zero quotatives'.

AB - The Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin (Worrorran) has one single complex-clause construction for expressing reported speech (`say'), that can also signal reported thought (`think') and attribute intentions (`want'). By demonstrating which formal and functional distinctions are essential to the interpretation of this Ungarinyin construction, the present paper aims to contribute to understanding the exact nature of the syntactic relation involved in reported speech constructions. Following the account of McGregor (1994; 1997; 2008), I analyse the clausal syntax of reported speech constructions as a dedicated syntactic relation, separate from more familiar clausal relations such as coordination and subordination. I call this relation the `frame-in' construction. Subsequently, I compare the conventionalised reported speech construction in Ungarinyin to a variety of more loosely integrated non-conventionalised or semi-conventionalised strategies for expressing speech and thought attribution in the language. Collectively I refer to these strategies as examples of `defenestration', constructions without the typical marking of the syntactic frame-in relation, while expressing the meaning associated with a regular frame-in construction. Instances of defenestration differ from syntactic frame-in in that they express the meaning of a frame-in construction through transparent compositional means. I argue that types of defenestration show remarkable regularities in Ungarinyin, and, tentatively, crosslinguistically, which has consequences for the analysis of indexicality and iconicity in syntax and presents a new context for analysing the syntax of reported speech constructions in relation to multimodal features, particulary for the category of free (in)direct speech and `zero quotatives'.

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.016

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.016

M3 - Article

SP - 104

EP - 133

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -