Ci sono differenti predittori della lettura nelle lingue che hanno un'ortografia trasparente? Evidenze da uno studio longitudinale

Translated title of the contribution: Do predictors of reading differ among transparent orthographies?: Evidence from a longitudinal study

Leena Holopainen, Doris Kofler, Arno Koch, Airi Hakkarainen, Kristin Bauer, Livia Taverna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use path modelling to establish how rapid automatized naming (RAN), verbal short-term memory (VSTM), letter-sound connection (LSC), phoneme blending (PHB), and Raven tasks predict reading in Finnish and German. Students (N = 769) from Finland, Germany, and Italy (German-speaking children from South Tyrol) were followed from first grade until the end of second grade. Firstly, in all countries, LSC was found to be the strongest predictor for reading in first grade. Secondly, Finnish students' word-reading skills were better than those of German and Italian students throughout the follow-up period, but word-reading level in first grade predicted word-reading level after one year only for Italian and German students. Thirdly, rapid automatized naming (RAN) and verbal short-term memory (VSTM) predicted reading skills in each orthography and country with a different power and at different phases, implying that the educational system also has a role in predicting reading skills.

Translated title of the contributionDo predictors of reading differ among transparent orthographies?: Evidence from a longitudinal study
Original languageItalian
JournalJournal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies
Volume2020
Issue number21
Pages (from-to)111-129
Number of pages19
ISSN2037-7932
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • ACQUISITION
  • Cross-linguistic analysis
  • DYSLEXIA
  • Educational systems
  • KINDERGARTEN
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • Orthography
  • PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS
  • Phonological processing
  • Reading acquisition
  • SKILLS
  • VOCABULARY
  • 516 Educational sciences

Cite this