Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis

J. I.  Kemper; W. Li; S. Goni; M. Flanagan; A. Weeks; Z. Alfirevic; H. Bracken; S. Mundle; M. Goonewardene; M. Ten Eikelder; K. Bloemenkamp; K. O. Rengerink; Heidi Kruit; B. W. Mol; K. R. Palmer

doi:10.1002/uog.23563

Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis

J. I. Kemper, W. Li, S. Goni, M. Flanagan, A. Weeks, Z. Alfirevic, H. Bracken, S. Mundle, M. Goonewardene, M. Ten Eikelder, K. Bloemenkamp, K. O. Rengerink, Heidi Kruit, B. W. Mol, K. R. Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

Original language	English
Journal	Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume	57
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	215-223
Number of pages	9
ISSN	0960-7692
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23563
Publication status	Published - Feb 2021
MoE publication type	A1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

Foley catheter
individual participant data
induction of labor
meta-analysis
misoprostol
safety
vaginal birth
3123 Gynaecology and paediatrics

Access to Document

10.1002/uog.23563

Cite this

Kemper, J. I., Li, W., Goni, S., Flanagan, M., Weeks, A., Alfirevic, Z., Bracken, H., Mundle, S., Goonewardene, M., Ten Eikelder, M., Bloemenkamp, K., Rengerink, K. O., Kruit, H., Mol, B. W., & Palmer, K. R. (2021). Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 57(2), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23563

@article{f5a8dc8aa5624ddcb7ccab05d82538bb,

title = "Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis",

keywords = "Foley catheter, individual participant data, induction of labor, meta-analysis, misoprostol, safety, vaginal birth, 3123 Gynaecology and paediatrics",

author = "Kemper, {J. I.} and W. Li and S. Goni and M. Flanagan and A. Weeks and Z. Alfirevic and H. Bracken and S. Mundle and M. Goonewardene and {Ten Eikelder}, M. and K. Bloemenkamp and Rengerink, {K. O.} and Heidi Kruit and Mol, {B. W.} and Palmer, {K. R.}",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1002/uog.23563",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "215--223",

journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology",

issn = "0960-7692",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

number = "2",

}

Kemper, JI, Li, W, Goni, S, Flanagan, M, Weeks, A, Alfirevic, Z, Bracken, H, Mundle, S, Goonewardene, M, Ten Eikelder, M, Bloemenkamp, K, Rengerink, KO, Kruit, H, Mol, BW & Palmer, KR 2021, 'Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis', Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23563

TY - JOUR

T1 - Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor

T2 - individual participant data meta-analysis

AU - Kemper, J. I.

AU - Li, W.

AU - Goni, S.

AU - Flanagan, M.

AU - Weeks, A.

AU - Alfirevic, Z.

AU - Bracken, H.

AU - Mundle, S.

AU - Goonewardene, M.

AU - Ten Eikelder, M.

AU - Bloemenkamp, K.

AU - Rengerink, K. O.

AU - Kruit, Heidi

AU - Mol, B. W.

AU - Palmer, K. R.

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

KW - Foley catheter

KW - individual participant data

KW - induction of labor

KW - meta-analysis

KW - misoprostol

KW - safety

KW - vaginal birth

KW - 3123 Gynaecology and paediatrics

U2 - 10.1002/uog.23563

DO - 10.1002/uog.23563

M3 - Article

SN - 0960-7692

VL - 57

SP - 215

EP - 223

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

IS - 2

ER -