Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Framing and classifying the theoretical and practical divide: how young men’s positions in vocational education are produced and reproduced

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Research material from ethnographic studies of vocational upper secondary educational programmes in Finland and Sweden presented here indicates that the discourse of schoolwork as being either theoretical or practical is firmly fixed. However, the students on the researched programmes were aware of recent changes in the labour market that raise a need for generalisation, or at least knowledge of both practical and theoretical aspects of their programme-specific subjects. They referred to the changes with notions suggesting that a practical and theoretical divide was neither meaningful nor helpful for their education. We discuss how a stereotyped idea of what was thought of as ‘man’s work’ made it difficult for students who wanted to accomplish tasks considered as theoretical and how the teachers’ framing of pedagogic practice intensified or ameliorated this difficulty. We also address the dichotomy between theoretical and practical by contemplating students’ positions within different pedagogical practices. We suggest that some kinds of practices might diminish the dichotomy and could improve the students’ possibilities for fully engaging in their studies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Vocational Education and Training
Volume65
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)445-460
Number of pages16
ISSN1363-6820
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 516 Educational sciences
  • vocational education
  • youth transitions
  • theory and practice

Cite this