Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

Daniel J. Klionsky, Kotb Abdelmohsen, Akihisa Abe, Md Joynal Abedin, Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen, Juha J. Hulmi, Laura Korhonen, Dan Lindholm, Mark Screen, Vassileios Stratoulias, Susu M. Zughaier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order.
Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAutophagy
Volume12
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-222
ISSN1554-8627
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Bibliographical note

More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order.
Volume:
Proceeding volume:

Fields of Science

  • 3111 Biomedicine
  • 1182 Biochemistry, cell and molecular biology
  • Autophagy
  • phagophore
  • amphisome
  • autolysosome
  • lysosome

Cite this

Klionsky, Daniel J. ; Abdelmohsen, Kotb ; Abe, Akihisa ; Abedin, Md Joynal ; Eskelinen, Eeva-Liisa ; Hulmi, Juha J. ; Korhonen, Laura ; Lindholm, Dan ; Screen, Mark ; Stratoulias, Vassileios ; Zughaier, Susu M. / Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). In: Autophagy. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 1-222.
@article{439daf05ea684095884a6f8c7d5eff05,
title = "Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)",
abstract = "More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order.Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.",
keywords = "3111 Biomedicine, 1182 Biochemistry, cell and molecular biology, Autophagy, phagophore, amphisome, autolysosome, lysosome",
author = "Klionsky, {Daniel J.} and Kotb Abdelmohsen and Akihisa Abe and Abedin, {Md Joynal} and Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen and Hulmi, {Juha J.} and Laura Korhonen and Dan Lindholm and Mark Screen and Vassileios Stratoulias and Zughaier, {Susu M.}",
note = "More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order. Volume: Proceeding volume:",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--222",
journal = "Autophagy",
issn = "1554-8627",
publisher = "TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC",
number = "1",

}

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). / Klionsky, Daniel J.; Abdelmohsen, Kotb; Abe, Akihisa; Abedin, Md Joynal; Eskelinen, Eeva-Liisa; Hulmi, Juha J.; Korhonen, Laura; Lindholm, Dan; Screen, Mark; Stratoulias, Vassileios; Zughaier, Susu M.

In: Autophagy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 21.01.2016, p. 1-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

AU - Klionsky, Daniel J.

AU - Abdelmohsen, Kotb

AU - Abe, Akihisa

AU - Abedin, Md Joynal

AU - Eskelinen, Eeva-Liisa

AU - Hulmi, Juha J.

AU - Korhonen, Laura

AU - Lindholm, Dan

AU - Screen, Mark

AU - Stratoulias, Vassileios

AU - Zughaier, Susu M.

N1 - More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order. Volume: Proceeding volume:

PY - 2016/1/21

Y1 - 2016/1/21

N2 - More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order.Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

AB - More than 2000 authors in alphabetical order.Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

KW - 3111 Biomedicine

KW - 1182 Biochemistry, cell and molecular biology

KW - Autophagy

KW - phagophore

KW - amphisome

KW - autolysosome

KW - lysosome

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/kaup20

U2 - 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

DO - 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 222

JO - Autophagy

JF - Autophagy

SN - 1554-8627

IS - 1

ER -