Abstract
We examined whether differences in climate-friendly choices between the supporters of left-wing and right-wing ideologies are based on different moral foundations. Moreover, we compared general and issue-specific endorsement of moral foundations applied to climate change. Study 1 examined the endorsement of general moral foundations of university students living in Finland (N = 272). Individualizing foundations were associated with increased climate-friendly choices and binding foundations were associated with decreased climate-friendly choices; the endorsement of moral foundations made the effect of political orientation disappear. In Study 2 we developed and tested an issue-specific measure of moral foundations (N = 350). The issue-specific endorsement of both types of foundations was directly associated with increased climate-friendly consumption. Binding foundations were associated with the avoidance of climate-friendly choices through right-wing orientation. These findings increase our understanding of differences between general and issue-specific moral concerns and their association to political orientation and pro-environmental behavior.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 265-283 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISSN | 1187-7863 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fields of Science
- 5144 Social psychology
- Climate change
- Moral foundations
- Moral relevance
- Political orientation
- Consumption
- Finland
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver