Indo-European Linguistics in the 21st Century (1)

From trilaryngealism to monolaryngealism: returning to Oswald Szemerényi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

By the present day only a handful of models are left to compete for a solution concerning the reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) laryngeal and vowel system. The remaining hybrid versions of the laryngeal theory, as proposed by EICHNER, MELCHERT, KORTLANDT, and RIX, explain the Indo-European (IE) vocalisms with both the laryngeals *h1 *h2 *h3 and at least two of the proto- vowels *e *o *a. Due to this dual fixation these models are inherently ambiguous, as in principle every IE vocalism can be explained with both a laryngeal and the respective vowel. This means that the laryngeal theory is ultimately incapable of solving the PIE laryngeal and vowel problem, and the only way out is a radical simplification of the framework. A simplification was first proposed by Oswald SZEMERÉNYI, who reconstructed a single glottal fricative PIE *h = Hitt. ḫ, accompanied by a near equivalent of the Neogrammarian vowel system *a e o ā ē ō å ǝ. Despite the need for additional work on a number of key problems, monolaryngealism, as proposed by him, remains the only realistic option for Indo-European linguistics in the 21st century.
Original languageEnglish
JournalProto-Indo-European Linguistics – Urindogermanische Sprachforschungen
Issue number1/2018
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
ISSN2489-3390
Publication statusPublished - 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 6121 Languages
  • Proto-Indo-European
  • Indo-European linguistics
  • Reconstruction

Cite this

@article{4e73ead1300b424a8209178806bcf4b7,
title = "Indo-European Linguistics in the 21st Century (1): From trilaryngealism to monolaryngealism: returning to Oswald Szemer{\'e}nyi",
abstract = "By the present day only a handful of models are left to compete for a solution concerning the reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) laryngeal and vowel system. The remaining hybrid versions of the laryngeal theory, as proposed by EICHNER, MELCHERT, KORTLANDT, and RIX, explain the Indo-European (IE) vocalisms with both the laryngeals *h1 *h2 *h3 and at least two of the proto- vowels *e *o *a. Due to this dual fixation these models are inherently ambiguous, as in principle every IE vocalism can be explained with both a laryngeal and the respective vowel. This means that the laryngeal theory is ultimately incapable of solving the PIE laryngeal and vowel problem, and the only way out is a radical simplification of the framework. A simplification was first proposed by Oswald SZEMER{\'E}NYI, who reconstructed a single glottal fricative PIE *h = Hitt. ḫ, accompanied by a near equivalent of the Neogrammarian vowel system *a e o ā ē ō {\aa} ǝ. Despite the need for additional work on a number of key problems, monolaryngealism, as proposed by him, remains the only realistic option for Indo-European linguistics in the 21st century.",
keywords = "6121 Languages, Proto-Indo-European, Indo-European linguistics, Reconstruction",
author = "Pyysalo, {Jouna Olavi} and Janhunen, {Juha Antero}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Proto-Indo-European Linguistics – Urindogermanische Sprachforschungen",
issn = "2489-3390",
publisher = "Proto-Indo-European Linguistics",
number = "1/2018",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indo-European Linguistics in the 21st Century (1)

T2 - From trilaryngealism to monolaryngealism: returning to Oswald Szemerényi

AU - Pyysalo, Jouna Olavi

AU - Janhunen, Juha Antero

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - By the present day only a handful of models are left to compete for a solution concerning the reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) laryngeal and vowel system. The remaining hybrid versions of the laryngeal theory, as proposed by EICHNER, MELCHERT, KORTLANDT, and RIX, explain the Indo-European (IE) vocalisms with both the laryngeals *h1 *h2 *h3 and at least two of the proto- vowels *e *o *a. Due to this dual fixation these models are inherently ambiguous, as in principle every IE vocalism can be explained with both a laryngeal and the respective vowel. This means that the laryngeal theory is ultimately incapable of solving the PIE laryngeal and vowel problem, and the only way out is a radical simplification of the framework. A simplification was first proposed by Oswald SZEMERÉNYI, who reconstructed a single glottal fricative PIE *h = Hitt. ḫ, accompanied by a near equivalent of the Neogrammarian vowel system *a e o ā ē ō å ǝ. Despite the need for additional work on a number of key problems, monolaryngealism, as proposed by him, remains the only realistic option for Indo-European linguistics in the 21st century.

AB - By the present day only a handful of models are left to compete for a solution concerning the reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) laryngeal and vowel system. The remaining hybrid versions of the laryngeal theory, as proposed by EICHNER, MELCHERT, KORTLANDT, and RIX, explain the Indo-European (IE) vocalisms with both the laryngeals *h1 *h2 *h3 and at least two of the proto- vowels *e *o *a. Due to this dual fixation these models are inherently ambiguous, as in principle every IE vocalism can be explained with both a laryngeal and the respective vowel. This means that the laryngeal theory is ultimately incapable of solving the PIE laryngeal and vowel problem, and the only way out is a radical simplification of the framework. A simplification was first proposed by Oswald SZEMERÉNYI, who reconstructed a single glottal fricative PIE *h = Hitt. ḫ, accompanied by a near equivalent of the Neogrammarian vowel system *a e o ā ē ō å ǝ. Despite the need for additional work on a number of key problems, monolaryngealism, as proposed by him, remains the only realistic option for Indo-European linguistics in the 21st century.

KW - 6121 Languages

KW - Proto-Indo-European

KW - Indo-European linguistics

KW - Reconstruction

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Proto-Indo-European Linguistics – Urindogermanische Sprachforschungen

JF - Proto-Indo-European Linguistics – Urindogermanische Sprachforschungen

SN - 2489-3390

IS - 1/2018

ER -