Infinitary Contraction‐Free Revenge

Andreas Fjellstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

How robust is a contraction‐free approach to the semantic paradoxes? This paper aims to show some limitations with the approach based on multiplicative rules by presenting and discussing the significance of a revenge paradox using a predicate representing an alethic modality defined with infinitary rules.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThought: A Journal of Philosophy
Volume7
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)179-189
Number of pages11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 611 Philosophy

Cite this

Fjellstad, Andreas. / Infinitary Contraction‐Free Revenge. In: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. 2018 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 179-189.
@article{dd9c877733494bb9a9dbb046319a5afe,
title = "Infinitary Contraction‐Free Revenge",
abstract = "How robust is a contraction‐free approach to the semantic paradoxes? This paper aims to show some limitations with the approach based on multiplicative rules by presenting and discussing the significance of a revenge paradox using a predicate representing an alethic modality defined with infinitary rules.",
keywords = "611 Philosophy",
author = "Andreas Fjellstad",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1002/tht3.382",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "179--189",
journal = "Thought: A Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "2161-2234",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Infinitary Contraction‐Free Revenge. / Fjellstad, Andreas.

In: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2018, p. 179-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infinitary Contraction‐Free Revenge

AU - Fjellstad, Andreas

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - How robust is a contraction‐free approach to the semantic paradoxes? This paper aims to show some limitations with the approach based on multiplicative rules by presenting and discussing the significance of a revenge paradox using a predicate representing an alethic modality defined with infinitary rules.

AB - How robust is a contraction‐free approach to the semantic paradoxes? This paper aims to show some limitations with the approach based on multiplicative rules by presenting and discussing the significance of a revenge paradox using a predicate representing an alethic modality defined with infinitary rules.

KW - 611 Philosophy

U2 - 10.1002/tht3.382

DO - 10.1002/tht3.382

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 179

EP - 189

JO - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy

JF - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy

SN - 2161-2234

IS - 3

ER -