Integrated governance for managing multidimensional problems: Potentials, challenges, and arrangements

Päivi Haapasaari, Suvi Ignatius, Mia Pihlajamaki, Andreas Bryhn, Simo Sarkki, Jouni T. Tuomisto, Lauri Ronkainen, Annukka Lehikoinen, Timo Assmuth, Atso Romakkaniemi, Heikki Peltonen, Sakari Kuikka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


The implementation challenge of ecosystem-based (fisheries) management (EB(F)M) has entailed calls for integrated governance (IG) approaches in the marine field. We arranged an expert workshop to study the preconditions and applicability of IG, and to suggest how IG could be arranged in practice. Focusing on the management of the dioxin problem shared by the herring and salmon fisheries in the Baltic Sea, and using a coupled ‘insight network’- SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) methodology, we evaluated two scenarios: 1) IG of herring and salmon fisheries to benefit from collaboration between these fisheries that suffer from the same problem, and 2) IG between the fisheries sector and the food/public health sector to incorporate food safety in fisheries governance. Our results demonstrate that a variety of societal, political, institutional, operational, instrumental, and biological factors affect the applicability of IG in marine contexts, and work as preconditions for IG. While societal needs for IG were obvious in our case, as major challenges for it we identified the competing cross-sectoral objectives, path dependencies, and limitations of experts to think and work across fields. The study suggests that establishing an IG framework by adding new aspects upon the current governance structures may be easier to accept and adapt to, than creating new strategic or advisory bodies or other new capacities. Viewing IG as a framework for understanding cross-sectoral issues instead of one that requires a defined level and form of integrated assessment and management may be a way towards social learning, and thereby towards the implementation of more sophisticated, open and broad EB(F)M frameworks.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104276
JournalMarine Policy
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • Baltic herring
  • Baltic salmon
  • Ecosystem-based management
  • Food safety
  • Inter-sectoral collaboration
  • Knowledge co-creation
  • Multi-species management
  • Social-ecological problem
  • SWOT-analysis
  • FISH
  • 1172 Environmental sciences
  • 1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology

Cite this