Integrating art into science education

a survey of science teachers’ practices

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Numerous case studies suggest that integrating art and science education could engage students with creative projects and encourage students to express science in multitude of ways. However, little is known about art integration practices in everyday science teaching. With a qualitative e-survey, this study explores the art integration of science teachers (n = 66). A pedagogical model for science teachers’ art integration emerged from a qualitative content analysis conducted on examples of art integration. In the model, art integration is characterised as integration through content and activities. Whilst the links in the content were facilitated either directly between concepts and ideas or indirectly through themes or artefacts, the integration through activity often connected an activity in one domain and a concept, idea or artefact in the other domain with the exception of some activities that could belong to both domains. Moreover, the examples of art integration in everyday classroom did not include expression of emotions often associated with art. In addition, quantitative part of the survey confirmed that integration is infrequent in all mapped areas. The findings of this study have implications for science teacher education that should offer opportunities for more consistent art integration.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume39
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1403-1419
Number of pages17
ISSN0950-0693
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • Art–science collaboration, in-service teachers
  • 516 Educational sciences

Cite this

@article{c5d1853522db4acca6408f0a27981554,
title = "Integrating art into science education: a survey of science teachers’ practices",
abstract = "Numerous case studies suggest that integrating art and science education could engage students with creative projects and encourage students to express science in multitude of ways. However, little is known about art integration practices in everyday science teaching. With a qualitative e-survey, this study explores the art integration of science teachers (n = 66). A pedagogical model for science teachers’ art integration emerged from a qualitative content analysis conducted on examples of art integration. In the model, art integration is characterised as integration through content and activities. Whilst the links in the content were facilitated either directly between concepts and ideas or indirectly through themes or artefacts, the integration through activity often connected an activity in one domain and a concept, idea or artefact in the other domain with the exception of some activities that could belong to both domains. Moreover, the examples of art integration in everyday classroom did not include expression of emotions often associated with art. In addition, quantitative part of the survey confirmed that integration is infrequent in all mapped areas. The findings of this study have implications for science teacher education that should offer opportunities for more consistent art integration.",
keywords = "Art–science collaboration, in-service teachers, 516 Educational sciences",
author = "Jaakko Turkka and Outi Haatainen and Maija Aksela",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2017.1333656",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1403--1419",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "10",

}

Integrating art into science education : a survey of science teachers’ practices. / Turkka, Jaakko; Haatainen, Outi; Aksela, Maija.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 39, No. 10, 01.06.2017, p. 1403-1419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating art into science education

T2 - a survey of science teachers’ practices

AU - Turkka, Jaakko

AU - Haatainen, Outi

AU - Aksela, Maija

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Numerous case studies suggest that integrating art and science education could engage students with creative projects and encourage students to express science in multitude of ways. However, little is known about art integration practices in everyday science teaching. With a qualitative e-survey, this study explores the art integration of science teachers (n = 66). A pedagogical model for science teachers’ art integration emerged from a qualitative content analysis conducted on examples of art integration. In the model, art integration is characterised as integration through content and activities. Whilst the links in the content were facilitated either directly between concepts and ideas or indirectly through themes or artefacts, the integration through activity often connected an activity in one domain and a concept, idea or artefact in the other domain with the exception of some activities that could belong to both domains. Moreover, the examples of art integration in everyday classroom did not include expression of emotions often associated with art. In addition, quantitative part of the survey confirmed that integration is infrequent in all mapped areas. The findings of this study have implications for science teacher education that should offer opportunities for more consistent art integration.

AB - Numerous case studies suggest that integrating art and science education could engage students with creative projects and encourage students to express science in multitude of ways. However, little is known about art integration practices in everyday science teaching. With a qualitative e-survey, this study explores the art integration of science teachers (n = 66). A pedagogical model for science teachers’ art integration emerged from a qualitative content analysis conducted on examples of art integration. In the model, art integration is characterised as integration through content and activities. Whilst the links in the content were facilitated either directly between concepts and ideas or indirectly through themes or artefacts, the integration through activity often connected an activity in one domain and a concept, idea or artefact in the other domain with the exception of some activities that could belong to both domains. Moreover, the examples of art integration in everyday classroom did not include expression of emotions often associated with art. In addition, quantitative part of the survey confirmed that integration is infrequent in all mapped areas. The findings of this study have implications for science teacher education that should offer opportunities for more consistent art integration.

KW - Art–science collaboration, in-service teachers

KW - 516 Educational sciences

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2017.1333656

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2017.1333656

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1403

EP - 1419

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 10

ER -