Kääntäjäopiskelijoiden käsityksiä jälkieditoinnista: ”Se sotii niitä periaatteita vastaan, joita käännöskursseilla opetetaan”

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


    This paper presents a study on translator students’ perceptions on post-editing. Students from two different Master’s level courses were asked to post-edit machine translated texts and reflect on the differences between light and full post-editing, on the differences between translating and post-editing, on the role of error analysis and the use of the instructions given, as well as consider their own aptitudes in post-editor. The results show that their attitudes were mainly positive, but they felt that the task was challenging: leaving grammatical errors and “raw
    translations” in the text were considered difficult. The majority of students also thought that making a full post-editing was easier than making a light post-editing. This was also reflected in their productions, as many students returned a light edit that corresponded to a full one.
    Original languageFinnish
    JournalMikaEL Kääntämisen ja tulkkauksen tutkimuksen symposiumin verkkojulkaisu
    Pages (from-to)121–135
    Number of pages15
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fields of Science

    • 6121 Languages

    Cite this