Making sense of maladaptation

Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives

Tina-Simone Neset, Therese Asplund , Janina Käyhkö, Sirkku Juhola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The need for climate change adaptation has been widely recognised and examples of successful adaptation are increasingly reported in the literature, but little attention has so far been paid to the potential negative impacts of implemented adaptation measures. As the agricultural sector is implementing measures to adapt to or cope with climatic variability and change, the potential negative consequences of these measures need to be explored in order to avoid increased vulnerability or (unintended) environmental impacts. This paper employs serious gaming and focus group methodology to study how agricultural stakeholders in Sweden and Finland frame and negotiate the unintended negative impacts of adaptation measures. The results of our interactional frame analysis suggest that the participants negotiated the potential maladaptive outcomes depending on: (1) whether they agreed that this was indeed a potential consequence of an adaptation measure, (2) whether they considered this to be a negative outcome, and if so whether it was (3) a negative outcome which they could adapt to, (4) a negative outcome that would make it preferable not to adapt at all (5) negotiable in terms of a trade-off with alternative outcomes. While it may be obvious that adaptation options that increase vulnerability should be avoided, this study illustrates the complex, value based, individual, yet dialogical processes and contextual basis for identifying and assessing maladaptation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClimatic Change
Volume153
Issue number1-2
Pages (from-to)107-121
Number of pages15
ISSN0165-0009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • ADAPTATION
  • CLIMATE-CHANGE
  • GOVERNANCE
  • 1172 Environmental sciences

Cite this

Neset, Tina-Simone ; Asplund , Therese ; Käyhkö, Janina ; Juhola, Sirkku. / Making sense of maladaptation : Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives. In: Climatic Change. 2019 ; Vol. 153, No. 1-2. pp. 107-121.
@article{7c0db7ea438d4e5e9c6d955d1e997045,
title = "Making sense of maladaptation: Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives",
abstract = "The need for climate change adaptation has been widely recognised and examples of successful adaptation are increasingly reported in the literature, but little attention has so far been paid to the potential negative impacts of implemented adaptation measures. As the agricultural sector is implementing measures to adapt to or cope with climatic variability and change, the potential negative consequences of these measures need to be explored in order to avoid increased vulnerability or (unintended) environmental impacts. This paper employs serious gaming and focus group methodology to study how agricultural stakeholders in Sweden and Finland frame and negotiate the unintended negative impacts of adaptation measures. The results of our interactional frame analysis suggest that the participants negotiated the potential maladaptive outcomes depending on: (1) whether they agreed that this was indeed a potential consequence of an adaptation measure, (2) whether they considered this to be a negative outcome, and if so whether it was (3) a negative outcome which they could adapt to, (4) a negative outcome that would make it preferable not to adapt at all (5) negotiable in terms of a trade-off with alternative outcomes. While it may be obvious that adaptation options that increase vulnerability should be avoided, this study illustrates the complex, value based, individual, yet dialogical processes and contextual basis for identifying and assessing maladaptation.",
keywords = "ADAPTATION, CLIMATE-CHANGE, GOVERNANCE, 1172 Environmental sciences",
author = "Tina-Simone Neset and Therese Asplund and Janina K{\"a}yhk{\"o} and Sirkku Juhola",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-019-02391-z",
language = "English",
volume = "153",
pages = "107--121",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1-2",

}

Making sense of maladaptation : Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives. / Neset, Tina-Simone; Asplund , Therese; Käyhkö, Janina; Juhola, Sirkku.

In: Climatic Change, Vol. 153, No. 1-2, 03.2019, p. 107-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of maladaptation

T2 - Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives

AU - Neset, Tina-Simone

AU - Asplund , Therese

AU - Käyhkö, Janina

AU - Juhola, Sirkku

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - The need for climate change adaptation has been widely recognised and examples of successful adaptation are increasingly reported in the literature, but little attention has so far been paid to the potential negative impacts of implemented adaptation measures. As the agricultural sector is implementing measures to adapt to or cope with climatic variability and change, the potential negative consequences of these measures need to be explored in order to avoid increased vulnerability or (unintended) environmental impacts. This paper employs serious gaming and focus group methodology to study how agricultural stakeholders in Sweden and Finland frame and negotiate the unintended negative impacts of adaptation measures. The results of our interactional frame analysis suggest that the participants negotiated the potential maladaptive outcomes depending on: (1) whether they agreed that this was indeed a potential consequence of an adaptation measure, (2) whether they considered this to be a negative outcome, and if so whether it was (3) a negative outcome which they could adapt to, (4) a negative outcome that would make it preferable not to adapt at all (5) negotiable in terms of a trade-off with alternative outcomes. While it may be obvious that adaptation options that increase vulnerability should be avoided, this study illustrates the complex, value based, individual, yet dialogical processes and contextual basis for identifying and assessing maladaptation.

AB - The need for climate change adaptation has been widely recognised and examples of successful adaptation are increasingly reported in the literature, but little attention has so far been paid to the potential negative impacts of implemented adaptation measures. As the agricultural sector is implementing measures to adapt to or cope with climatic variability and change, the potential negative consequences of these measures need to be explored in order to avoid increased vulnerability or (unintended) environmental impacts. This paper employs serious gaming and focus group methodology to study how agricultural stakeholders in Sweden and Finland frame and negotiate the unintended negative impacts of adaptation measures. The results of our interactional frame analysis suggest that the participants negotiated the potential maladaptive outcomes depending on: (1) whether they agreed that this was indeed a potential consequence of an adaptation measure, (2) whether they considered this to be a negative outcome, and if so whether it was (3) a negative outcome which they could adapt to, (4) a negative outcome that would make it preferable not to adapt at all (5) negotiable in terms of a trade-off with alternative outcomes. While it may be obvious that adaptation options that increase vulnerability should be avoided, this study illustrates the complex, value based, individual, yet dialogical processes and contextual basis for identifying and assessing maladaptation.

KW - ADAPTATION

KW - CLIMATE-CHANGE

KW - GOVERNANCE

KW - 1172 Environmental sciences

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-019-02391-z

DO - 10.1007/s10584-019-02391-z

M3 - Article

VL - 153

SP - 107

EP - 121

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

IS - 1-2

ER -