Abstract
We study whether robots can satisfy the conditions of an agent fit to be held morally responsible, with a focus on autonomy and self-control. An analogy between robots and human groups enables us to modify arguments concerning collective responsibility for studying questions of robot responsibility. We employ Mele’s history-sensitive account of autonomy and responsibility to argue that even if robots were to have all the capacities required of moral agency, their history would deprive them from autonomy in a responsibility-undermining way. We will also study whether humans and technological artifacts like robots can form hybrid collective agents that could be morally responsible for their actions and give an argument against such a possibility.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | The Monist |
Volume | 102 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 259–275 |
Number of pages | 17 |
ISSN | 0026-9662 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2019 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fields of Science
- 611 Philosophy