Abstract
Contemporary human-centered organization and management practices endanger the planet’s health, affecting the life and death of multiple species—including humans. Drawing on insights from multispecies ethnography and feminist new materialism, this article contributes to the business ethics literature by developing a theoretical framework for multispecies organizing as a matter of care. Going beyond existing understandings of human-animal relations, we show how ethico-political dynamics shape multispecies relations in three ways: how we and other species relate to ecologies-in-place (affective relationalities); what we and other species do (vital doings); and, finally, what kinds of worlds we—through our ethical sensibilities—commit to bring into being (ethical obligations). Using an illustrative example of a rewilding site in England, this article shows how multispecies organizing plays out in a specific ecology-in-place. Our argument has important implications for the conception and contemporary practices of the organizational ethics of life and death.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Business Ethics Quarterly |
ISSN | 1052-150X |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 4 Feb 2025 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fields of Science
- 512 Business and Management
- affect
- ethics of care
- more-than-human responsibility
- regenerative organizations
- rewilding
- relational sustainability