On optimal extraction under asymmetric information over reclamation costs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Polluting exhaustible resource extraction ends with costly reclamation and producers have better information about future reclamation costs than the regulator. This paper analyzes optimal contract between the regulator and the mining firm in a two-stage model, in which extraction and pollution generation is followed by reclamation with asymmetric information over reclamation costs. The contract consists of a pollution tax and a mechanism used for cost information revelation, and it extracts all the profit from the highest-cost type, leaves profits for the more efficient types and dictates a reclamation effort that is lower than the complete information effort. It is further shown that the optimal pollution tax under asymmetric information can be lower or higher than the tax under complete information. In addition, the exclusion of the most expensive types is analyzed. The results can help to design policies that improve the existing ones by saving public funds, by improving the state of the environment and by excluding those mining operations that do not produce (net) benefits for the society. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103987
JournalJournal of Economic Dynamics & Control
Volume119
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
ISSN0165-1889
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • Asymmetric information
  • DEPLETION
  • Dynamic optimization
  • Exhaustible resources
  • FOSSIL-FUELS
  • INCENTIVES
  • MINE
  • NATURAL-RESOURCES
  • OIL
  • OPTIMAL ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY
  • Optimal contract
  • POLLUTION
  • Pollution tax
  • RESOURCE EXTRACTION
  • Reclamation
  • Second-best
  • Stock pollution
  • TAXATION
  • 512 Business and Management

Cite this