Abstract
The Paris Agreement and the subsequent IPCC Global Warming of 1.5 degrees C report signal a need for greater urgency in achieving carbon emissions reductions. In this paper we make a two stage argument for greater use of carbon taxes and for a global approach to this. First, we argue that current modelling tends to lead to a "facts in waiting" approach to technology, which takes insufficient account of uncertainty. Rather than look to the future, carbon taxes that facilitate social redesign are something we have control over now. Second, we argue that the "trade" in "cap and trade" has been ineffective and carbon trading has served mainly as a distraction. Carbon taxes provide a simpler more flexible and pervasive alternative. We conclude with brief discussion of global context.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 112753 |
Journal | Journal of Environmental Management |
Volume | 292 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISSN | 0301-4797 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Aug 2021 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fields of Science
- Carbon taxes
- Carbon trading
- Climate emergency
- ECONOMICS
- EMISSIONS
- EU ETS
- Paris agreement
- 5172 Global Politics