Abstract
C. S. Lewis had serious disagreements with Anders Nygren’s theology of love. Several scholars have noticed the similarities between Nygren’s eros-love and Lewis’s concept of need-love. This article suggests, however, that need-love is not necessarily the best candidate in Lewis’s taxonomy of love as a translation of eros. The author argues that Lewis’s concept of Joy is a largely overlooked contribution to the “Nygren debate”, and contrasts it with the three main features of Nygren’s eros. While capturing a significant portion of eros, Joy seems to avoid many its derogative exaggerations. In Lewis’s theological vision, spiritual longing, rather than jeopardising the Gospel, is a God-given desire that prepares the return to its Giver.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Harvard Theological Review |
Volume | 109 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 207-232 |
Number of pages | 26 |
ISSN | 0017-8160 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fields of Science
- 614 Theology