Questionable devices: Applying a large language model to deliberate carbon removal

Laurie Waller, David Moats, Emily Cox, Rob Bellamy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents a device-centred approach to deliberation, developed in deliberative workshops appraising methods for removing carbon dioxide from the air. Our approach involved deploying the Large Language Model application ChatGPT (sometimes termed “generative AI”) to elicit questions and generate texts about carbon removal. We develop the notion of the “questionable” device to foreground the informational unruliness ChatGPT introduced into the deliberations. The analysis highlights occasions where the deliberative apparatus became a focus of collective critique, including over: issue definitions, expert-curated resources, lay identities and social classifications. However, in this set-up ChatGPT was all too often engaged unquestioningly as an instrument for informing discussion; its instrumental lure disguising the unruliness it introduced into the workshops. In concluding, we elaborate the notion of questionable devices and reflect on the way carbon removal has been “devised” as a field in want of informed deliberation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103940
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume162
ISSN1462-9011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Nov 2024
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 5141 Sociology
  • 113 Computer and information sciences
  • Carbon removal
  • Deliberation
  • Experiments in participation
  • Generative AI
  • Large language models

Cite this