Abstract
What endogenous factors contribute to minority (Red Queen) or majority (Red King) domination under conditions of coercive bargaining? We build on previous work demonstrating minority disadvantage in non-coercive bargaining games to show that under neutral initial conditions, majorities are advantaged in high conflict situations, and minorities are advantaged in low conflict games. These effects are a function of the relationship between (1) relative proportions of the majority and minority groups and (2) costs of conflict. Although both Red King and Red Queen effects can occur, we further show that agents’ increased initial propensity toward conflict advantages majorities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Mathematical Sociology |
Number of pages | 28 |
ISSN | 0022-250X |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 20 Feb 2022 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fields of Science
- 5171 Political Science
- discrimination
- coercive bargaining
- asymmetric convention
- Hawk Dove
- Red Queen effect
- Red King effect