Reducing regulatory burden through high-quality legislative drafting: laadukkaalla sääntelyllä kevyempi taakka

Kati Elina Rantala, Pertti Pellervo Ahonen, Noora Kristiina Alasuutari, Jussi Kauppila, Petrus Kautto, Kanerva Eliisa Kuokkanen, Essi Römpötti, Karolina Valborg Saarenpää, Jyrki Kauko Juhani Tala, Petri Uusikylä

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned reportProfessional

Abstract

Reducing regulatory burden through high-quality legislative drafting
Towards a realistic representation of regulatory burden

Regulatory burden often refers to such impacts of legislation that burden the subjects of regulation in terms of finances, taking up their time or causing inconvenience or annoyance. The research project ”Evaluating and reducing regulatory burdens” (2016–2018), funded by the Finnish Government, strove towards drafting a general overview that would be as comprehensive, realistic and versatile as possible of regulatory burden caused to companies and citizens in Finland. Producing a precise, quantitative overall assessment of regulatory burden proved to be impossible, however. Even though other OECD and EU countries have presented numerical estimates, the reliability of these figures has been questioned in various evaluations.

Regulatory burden does not mean that regulation in itself is a burden. Accordingly, identifying the central sources of unnecessary burden was a specific goal. Unnecessary burden is generated by the following factors, for example: unclear regulations that are prone to changing quickly, contradictory and overlapping requirements, excessively burdensome procedures in terms of interacting with the authorities, and incoherent implementation of regulation.

The various forms of regulatory burden have been analysed using various sets of materials, methods and interpretative frameworks. The analyses offer a multifaceted image of the dimensions of regulatory burden on a general level. The analyses also explain why it is difficult to provide a numerical overall estimate of regulatory burden, and why such endeavours may not be very sensible. According to the key results, 1) regulatory burden is a vague concept but multifaceted as a phenomenon, 2) it is difficult to measure regulatory burden, 3) insufficient understanding and managing of regulation, and problems with implementation, make up a core section of regulatory burden, 4) target parties’ experiences of regulatory burden are varied. The project puts forth 15 development proposals. They focus on the targeting of measures to reduce regulatory burden, the quality of legislative drafting and the development of implementation procedures.

This Policy Brief presents the general results of the project. Three other Policy Briefs also exist based on the project. They concern regulatory burden on companies, on civic activity and on individuals, as well as the "one-in, one-out principle" in more detail.

English and Swedish translations of the publication available here: https://tietokayttoon.fi/julkaisu?pubid=25501
Translated title of the contributionReducing regulatory burden through high-quality legislative drafting
Original languageFinnish
Place of PublicationHelsinki
PublisherValtioneuvoston kanslia
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2018
MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

Publication series

NamePolicy Brief
PublisherValtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminta
No.11/2018

Fields of Science

  • 517 Political science

Cite this

Rantala, K. E., Ahonen, P. P., Alasuutari, N. K., Kauppila, J., Kautto, P., Kuokkanen, K. E., ... Uusikylä, P. (2018). Sääntelytaakan vähentäminen: laadukkaalla sääntelyllä kevyempi taakka. (Policy Brief; No. 11/2018). Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston kanslia.
Rantala, Kati Elina ; Ahonen, Pertti Pellervo ; Alasuutari, Noora Kristiina ; Kauppila, Jussi ; Kautto, Petrus ; Kuokkanen, Kanerva Eliisa ; Römpötti, Essi ; Saarenpää, Karolina Valborg ; Tala, Jyrki Kauko Juhani ; Uusikylä, Petri. / Sääntelytaakan vähentäminen : laadukkaalla sääntelyllä kevyempi taakka. Helsinki : Valtioneuvoston kanslia, 2018. 9 p. (Policy Brief; 11/2018).
@book{268da91a95fb4ecf8bb6794c516b3ce2,
title = "S{\"a}{\"a}ntelytaakan v{\"a}hent{\"a}minen: laadukkaalla s{\"a}{\"a}ntelyll{\"a} kevyempi taakka",
abstract = "Reducing regulatory burden through high-quality legislative draftingTowards a realistic representation of regulatory burdenRegulatory burden often refers to such impacts of legislation that burden the subjects of regulation in terms of finances, taking up their time or causing inconvenience or annoyance. The research project ”Evaluating and reducing regulatory burdens” (2016–2018), funded by the Finnish Government, strove towards drafting a general overview that would be as comprehensive, realistic and versatile as possible of regulatory burden caused to companies and citizens in Finland. Producing a precise, quantitative overall assessment of regulatory burden proved to be impossible, however. Even though other OECD and EU countries have presented numerical estimates, the reliability of these figures has been questioned in various evaluations.Regulatory burden does not mean that regulation in itself is a burden. Accordingly, identifying the central sources of unnecessary burden was a specific goal. Unnecessary burden is generated by the following factors, for example: unclear regulations that are prone to changing quickly, contradictory and overlapping requirements, excessively burdensome procedures in terms of interacting with the authorities, and incoherent implementation of regulation.The various forms of regulatory burden have been analysed using various sets of materials, methods and interpretative frameworks. The analyses offer a multifaceted image of the dimensions of regulatory burden on a general level. The analyses also explain why it is difficult to provide a numerical overall estimate of regulatory burden, and why such endeavours may not be very sensible. According to the key results, 1) regulatory burden is a vague concept but multifaceted as a phenomenon, 2) it is difficult to measure regulatory burden, 3) insufficient understanding and managing of regulation, and problems with implementation, make up a core section of regulatory burden, 4) target parties’ experiences of regulatory burden are varied. The project puts forth 15 development proposals. They focus on the targeting of measures to reduce regulatory burden, the quality of legislative drafting and the development of implementation procedures.This Policy Brief presents the general results of the project. Three other Policy Briefs also exist based on the project. They concern regulatory burden on companies, on civic activity and on individuals, as well as the {"}one-in, one-out principle{"} in more detail.English and Swedish translations of the publication available here: https://tietokayttoon.fi/julkaisu?pubid=25501",
keywords = "517 Valtio-oppi, hallintotiede",
author = "Rantala, {Kati Elina} and Ahonen, {Pertti Pellervo} and Alasuutari, {Noora Kristiina} and Jussi Kauppila and Petrus Kautto and Kuokkanen, {Kanerva Eliisa} and Essi R{\"o}mp{\"o}tti and Saarenp{\"a}{\"a}, {Karolina Valborg} and Tala, {Jyrki Kauko Juhani} and Petri Uusikyl{\"a}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "20",
language = "suomi",
series = "Policy Brief",
publisher = "Valtioneuvoston kanslia",
number = "11/2018",
address = "Suomi",

}

Rantala, KE, Ahonen, PP, Alasuutari, NK, Kauppila, J, Kautto, P, Kuokkanen, KE, Römpötti, E, Saarenpää, KV, Tala, JKJ & Uusikylä, P 2018, Sääntelytaakan vähentäminen: laadukkaalla sääntelyllä kevyempi taakka. Policy Brief, no. 11/2018, Valtioneuvoston kanslia, Helsinki.

Sääntelytaakan vähentäminen : laadukkaalla sääntelyllä kevyempi taakka. / Rantala, Kati Elina; Ahonen, Pertti Pellervo; Alasuutari, Noora Kristiina; Kauppila, Jussi; Kautto, Petrus; Kuokkanen, Kanerva Eliisa; Römpötti, Essi; Saarenpää, Karolina Valborg; Tala, Jyrki Kauko Juhani; Uusikylä, Petri.

Helsinki : Valtioneuvoston kanslia, 2018. 9 p. (Policy Brief; No. 11/2018).

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned reportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - Sääntelytaakan vähentäminen

T2 - laadukkaalla sääntelyllä kevyempi taakka

AU - Rantala, Kati Elina

AU - Ahonen, Pertti Pellervo

AU - Alasuutari, Noora Kristiina

AU - Kauppila, Jussi

AU - Kautto, Petrus

AU - Kuokkanen, Kanerva Eliisa

AU - Römpötti, Essi

AU - Saarenpää, Karolina Valborg

AU - Tala, Jyrki Kauko Juhani

AU - Uusikylä, Petri

PY - 2018/3/20

Y1 - 2018/3/20

N2 - Reducing regulatory burden through high-quality legislative draftingTowards a realistic representation of regulatory burdenRegulatory burden often refers to such impacts of legislation that burden the subjects of regulation in terms of finances, taking up their time or causing inconvenience or annoyance. The research project ”Evaluating and reducing regulatory burdens” (2016–2018), funded by the Finnish Government, strove towards drafting a general overview that would be as comprehensive, realistic and versatile as possible of regulatory burden caused to companies and citizens in Finland. Producing a precise, quantitative overall assessment of regulatory burden proved to be impossible, however. Even though other OECD and EU countries have presented numerical estimates, the reliability of these figures has been questioned in various evaluations.Regulatory burden does not mean that regulation in itself is a burden. Accordingly, identifying the central sources of unnecessary burden was a specific goal. Unnecessary burden is generated by the following factors, for example: unclear regulations that are prone to changing quickly, contradictory and overlapping requirements, excessively burdensome procedures in terms of interacting with the authorities, and incoherent implementation of regulation.The various forms of regulatory burden have been analysed using various sets of materials, methods and interpretative frameworks. The analyses offer a multifaceted image of the dimensions of regulatory burden on a general level. The analyses also explain why it is difficult to provide a numerical overall estimate of regulatory burden, and why such endeavours may not be very sensible. According to the key results, 1) regulatory burden is a vague concept but multifaceted as a phenomenon, 2) it is difficult to measure regulatory burden, 3) insufficient understanding and managing of regulation, and problems with implementation, make up a core section of regulatory burden, 4) target parties’ experiences of regulatory burden are varied. The project puts forth 15 development proposals. They focus on the targeting of measures to reduce regulatory burden, the quality of legislative drafting and the development of implementation procedures.This Policy Brief presents the general results of the project. Three other Policy Briefs also exist based on the project. They concern regulatory burden on companies, on civic activity and on individuals, as well as the "one-in, one-out principle" in more detail.English and Swedish translations of the publication available here: https://tietokayttoon.fi/julkaisu?pubid=25501

AB - Reducing regulatory burden through high-quality legislative draftingTowards a realistic representation of regulatory burdenRegulatory burden often refers to such impacts of legislation that burden the subjects of regulation in terms of finances, taking up their time or causing inconvenience or annoyance. The research project ”Evaluating and reducing regulatory burdens” (2016–2018), funded by the Finnish Government, strove towards drafting a general overview that would be as comprehensive, realistic and versatile as possible of regulatory burden caused to companies and citizens in Finland. Producing a precise, quantitative overall assessment of regulatory burden proved to be impossible, however. Even though other OECD and EU countries have presented numerical estimates, the reliability of these figures has been questioned in various evaluations.Regulatory burden does not mean that regulation in itself is a burden. Accordingly, identifying the central sources of unnecessary burden was a specific goal. Unnecessary burden is generated by the following factors, for example: unclear regulations that are prone to changing quickly, contradictory and overlapping requirements, excessively burdensome procedures in terms of interacting with the authorities, and incoherent implementation of regulation.The various forms of regulatory burden have been analysed using various sets of materials, methods and interpretative frameworks. The analyses offer a multifaceted image of the dimensions of regulatory burden on a general level. The analyses also explain why it is difficult to provide a numerical overall estimate of regulatory burden, and why such endeavours may not be very sensible. According to the key results, 1) regulatory burden is a vague concept but multifaceted as a phenomenon, 2) it is difficult to measure regulatory burden, 3) insufficient understanding and managing of regulation, and problems with implementation, make up a core section of regulatory burden, 4) target parties’ experiences of regulatory burden are varied. The project puts forth 15 development proposals. They focus on the targeting of measures to reduce regulatory burden, the quality of legislative drafting and the development of implementation procedures.This Policy Brief presents the general results of the project. Three other Policy Briefs also exist based on the project. They concern regulatory burden on companies, on civic activity and on individuals, as well as the "one-in, one-out principle" in more detail.English and Swedish translations of the publication available here: https://tietokayttoon.fi/julkaisu?pubid=25501

KW - 517 Valtio-oppi, hallintotiede

M3 - Tutkimusraportti

T3 - Policy Brief

BT - Sääntelytaakan vähentäminen

PB - Valtioneuvoston kanslia

CY - Helsinki

ER -

Rantala KE, Ahonen PP, Alasuutari NK, Kauppila J, Kautto P, Kuokkanen KE et al. Sääntelytaakan vähentäminen: laadukkaalla sääntelyllä kevyempi taakka. Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston kanslia, 2018. 9 p. (Policy Brief; 11/2018).