The paper examines conventions of attribution in the discourse of two global news agencies, AP (the Associated Press) and Reuters, from the point of view of responsibility. In news agency reporting, the notion of responsibility is central on various intertwining levels. At the macro-level, news agencies bear responsibility as powerful distributors of news. They are important agenda-setters for other media and, to a great extent, also responsible for creating and reinforcing conventions of news writing. At the micro-level, the study explores two kinds of responsibility in the attribution of claims: the responsibility of news actors, i.e. those who have been quoted in news reports, and that of journalists. The analysis illustrates how the traditional structure of a news report affects attribution routines. Discontinuous topic realization, together with the tendency of proceeding from general to specific, opens up various rhetorical options to the journalist and can lead to ambiguity. The study further deals with the complex issue of sharing responsibility between the journalist and the news actor, for examples when sources remain anonymous.
|Journal||Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice|
|Issue number||No 3 (2012)|
|Number of pages||19|
|Publication status||Published - 10 Jul 2015|
|MoE publication type||A1 Journal article-refereed|
Fields of Science
- 518 Media and communications