Abstract
Development economics must be rethought. Not only has it hindered the liberation of the Global South, it has also deflected attention from the most critical questions of underdevelopment. Much economics inspires dirty growth, while Western political economy risks defending recolonisation under the guise of protecting nature in the Global South. Most alternative development theorising is similarly Western-centric. Georgist political economy is a possible exception. The systems of land economics Georgist political economy offers is functional and adaptable, often reflecting and supporting ancient knowledge of the earth, facilitating the decolonisation of society, economy, and ecology. The challenge is how to bring about this transformation when many interests potentially run counter to this non-Western alternative development economics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Review of Political Economy |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 316-333 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISSN | 0953-8259 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2023 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fields of Science
- 5203 Global Development Studies
- Land economics
- Decolonising development economics
- Political economy
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver