Shedding more light on language classification using basic vocabularies and phylogenetic methods: A case study of Uralic

Kaj Syrjänen, Terhi Honkola, Kalle Heikki Korhonen, Jyri Lehtinen, Outi Vesakoski, Niklas Wahlberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Encouraged by ongoing discussion of the classification of the Uralic languages, we investigate the family quantitatively using Bayesian phylogenetics and basic vocabulary from seventeen languages. To estimate the heterogeneity within this family and the robustness of its subgroupings, we analyse ten divergent sets of basic vocabulary, including basic vocabulary lists from the literature, lists that exclude borrowing-susceptible meanings, lists with varying degrees of borrowing-susceptible meanings and a list combining all of the examined items. The results show that the Uralic phylogeny has a fairly robust shape from the perspective of basic vocabulary, and is not dramatically altered by borrowing-susceptible meanings. The results differ to some extent from the ‘standard paradigm’ classification of these languages, such as the lack of firm evidence for Finno-Permian.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDiachronica
Volume30
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)323-352
ISSN0176-4225
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 6121 Languages
  • 1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology

Cite this

@article{91776bdd6c60428f997f102b3fc72a07,
title = "Shedding more light on language classification using basic vocabularies and phylogenetic methods: A case study of Uralic",
abstract = "Encouraged by ongoing discussion of the classification of the Uralic languages, we investigate the family quantitatively using Bayesian phylogenetics and basic vocabulary from seventeen languages. To estimate the heterogeneity within this family and the robustness of its subgroupings, we analyse ten divergent sets of basic vocabulary, including basic vocabulary lists from the literature, lists that exclude borrowing-susceptible meanings, lists with varying degrees of borrowing-susceptible meanings and a list combining all of the examined items. The results show that the Uralic phylogeny has a fairly robust shape from the perspective of basic vocabulary, and is not dramatically altered by borrowing-susceptible meanings. The results differ to some extent from the ‘standard paradigm’ classification of these languages, such as the lack of firm evidence for Finno-Permian.",
keywords = "6121 Languages, 1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology",
author = "Kaj Syrj{\"a}nen and Terhi Honkola and Korhonen, {Kalle Heikki} and Jyri Lehtinen and Outi Vesakoski and Niklas Wahlberg",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1075/dia.30.3.02syr",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "323--352",
journal = "Diachronica",
issn = "0176-4225",
publisher = "John Benjamins",
number = "3",

}

Shedding more light on language classification using basic vocabularies and phylogenetic methods : A case study of Uralic. / Syrjänen, Kaj; Honkola, Terhi; Korhonen, Kalle Heikki; Lehtinen, Jyri; Vesakoski, Outi; Wahlberg, Niklas.

In: Diachronica, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2013, p. 323-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shedding more light on language classification using basic vocabularies and phylogenetic methods

T2 - A case study of Uralic

AU - Syrjänen, Kaj

AU - Honkola, Terhi

AU - Korhonen, Kalle Heikki

AU - Lehtinen, Jyri

AU - Vesakoski, Outi

AU - Wahlberg, Niklas

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Encouraged by ongoing discussion of the classification of the Uralic languages, we investigate the family quantitatively using Bayesian phylogenetics and basic vocabulary from seventeen languages. To estimate the heterogeneity within this family and the robustness of its subgroupings, we analyse ten divergent sets of basic vocabulary, including basic vocabulary lists from the literature, lists that exclude borrowing-susceptible meanings, lists with varying degrees of borrowing-susceptible meanings and a list combining all of the examined items. The results show that the Uralic phylogeny has a fairly robust shape from the perspective of basic vocabulary, and is not dramatically altered by borrowing-susceptible meanings. The results differ to some extent from the ‘standard paradigm’ classification of these languages, such as the lack of firm evidence for Finno-Permian.

AB - Encouraged by ongoing discussion of the classification of the Uralic languages, we investigate the family quantitatively using Bayesian phylogenetics and basic vocabulary from seventeen languages. To estimate the heterogeneity within this family and the robustness of its subgroupings, we analyse ten divergent sets of basic vocabulary, including basic vocabulary lists from the literature, lists that exclude borrowing-susceptible meanings, lists with varying degrees of borrowing-susceptible meanings and a list combining all of the examined items. The results show that the Uralic phylogeny has a fairly robust shape from the perspective of basic vocabulary, and is not dramatically altered by borrowing-susceptible meanings. The results differ to some extent from the ‘standard paradigm’ classification of these languages, such as the lack of firm evidence for Finno-Permian.

KW - 6121 Languages

KW - 1181 Ecology, evolutionary biology

U2 - 10.1075/dia.30.3.02syr

DO - 10.1075/dia.30.3.02syr

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 323

EP - 352

JO - Diachronica

JF - Diachronica

SN - 0176-4225

IS - 3

ER -