Status of global coastal adaptation

Alexandre Magnan, Robert Bell, Virginie Duvat, James Ford, Matthias Garschagen, Marjolijn Haasnoot, Carmen Lacambra, Inigo Losada, Katharine Mach, Melinda Noblet, Devanathan Parthasaranthy, Marcello Sano, Katharine Vincent, Ariadna Anisimov, Susan Hanson, Alexandra Malmström (née Jurgilevich), Robert Nicholls, Gundula Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The state of progress towards climate adaptation is currently unclear. Here we apply a structured expert judgement to assess multiple dimensions shaping adaptation (equally weighted): risk knowledge, planning, action, capacities, evidence on risk reduction, long-term pathway strategies. We apply this approach to 61 local coastal case studies clustered into four urban and rural archetypes to develop a locally informed perspective on the state of global coastal adaptation. We show with medium confidence that today’s global coastal adaptation is halfway to the full adaptation potential. Urban archetypes generally score higher than rural ones (with a wide spread of local situations), adaptation efforts are unbalanced across the assessment dimensions and strategizing for long-term pathways remains limited. The results provide a multi-dimensional and locally grounded assessment of global coastal adaptation and lay new foundations for international climate negotiations by showing that there is room to refine global adaptation targets and identify priorities transcending development levels.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume13
Pages (from-to)1213-1221
Number of pages9
ISSN1758-678X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2023
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 1172 Environmental sciences

Cite this