Surface engineering strategies to enhance the in situ performance of medical devices including atomic scale engineering

Afreen Sultana, Mina Zare, Hongrong Luo, Seeram Ramakrishna

Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Decades of intense scientific research investigations clearly suggest that only a subset of a large number of metals, ceramics, polymers, composites, and nanomaterials are suitable as bio-materials for a growing number of biomedical devices and biomedical uses. However, biomaterials are prone to microbial infection due to Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), hepatitis, tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and many more. Hence, a range of surface engineering strategies are devised in order to achieve desired biocompatibility and antimicrobial performance in situ. Surface engineering strategies are a group of techniques that alter or modify the surface properties of the material in order to obtain a product with desired functionalities. There are two categories of surface engineering methods: conventional surface engineering methods (such as coating, bioactive coating, plasma spray coating, hydrothermal, lithography, shot peening, and electrophoretic deposition) and emerging surface engineering methods (laser treatment, robot laser treatment, electrospinning, electrospray, additive manufacturing, and radio frequency magnetron sputtering technique). Atomic-scale engineering, such as chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer etching, plasma immersion ion deposition, and atomic layer deposition, is a subsection of emerging technology that has demonstrated improved control and flexibility at finer length scales than compared to the conventional methods. With the advancements in technologies and the demand for even better control of biomaterial surfaces, research efforts in recent years are aimed at the atomic scale and molecular scale while incorporating functional agents in order to elicit optimal in situ performance. The functional agents include synthetic materials (monolithic ZnO, quaternary ammonium salts, silver nano-clusters, titanium diox-ide, and graphene) and natural materials (chitosan, totarol, botanical extracts, and nisin). This review highlights the various strategies of surface engineering of biomaterial including their functional mechanism, applications, and shortcomings. Additionally, this review article emphasizes atomic scale engineering of biomaterials for fabricating antimicrobial biomaterials and explores their challenges.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11788
JournalInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
Volume22
Issue number21
ISSN1661-6596
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes
MoE publication typeA2 Review article in a scientific journal

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the funding support of the UParis-NUS 2020, Under IdEX code: ANR-18-IDEX-00001, project number: 2020-06-R/UP-NUS, and Project title: Nanofibrous scaffold functionalized with extracellular vesicle for adaptive cardiac remodeling. There is no funding source for the APC charges.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Fields of Science

  • Antimicro-bial activity
  • Atomic scale engineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Medical devices
  • Modern surface engineering
  • Surface engineering
  • Traditional surface engineering

Cite this