Taking a stand through food choices? Characteristics of political food consumption and consumers in Finland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study looks at food as a realm of political consumption by examining buycotting and boycotting of foods for ethical, political or environmental reasons in Finland. The results of an Internet-based survey (N = 1021) showed that around half of the respondents often or occasionally both buycotted and boycotted foods. Multinomial regression models indicated that women, the highly educated, the political left, those who donated for charity, those whose food choices were motivated by domestic origin and ethical food production, and those who trusted that consumption choices, institutional actors and the media can advance ethical food production and consumption, were most likely to be active in buycotting and boycotting. Buycotters/boycotters were very active in buying local food but less eager, for instance, to buy organic or Fair Trade products or to reduce the use of meat or milk. The article concludes by critically assessing the complex relationship between buycotting/boycotting and sustainable practices and suggesting that consumers may be more willing to transform their eating patterns if other societal actors, too, make an effort to influence ethical food consumption.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEcological Economics
Volume154
Pages (from-to)349-360
Number of pages12
ISSN0921-8009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 5141 Sociology
  • boycotting
  • buycotting
  • food
  • political consumption
  • Survey

Cite this

@article{f2fa479b20574fe1a2af7af43ff3d76b,
title = "Taking a stand through food choices?: Characteristics of political food consumption and consumers in Finland",
abstract = "This study looks at food as a realm of political consumption by examining buycotting and boycotting of foods for ethical, political or environmental reasons in Finland. The results of an Internet-based survey (N = 1021) showed that around half of the respondents often or occasionally both buycotted and boycotted foods. Multinomial regression models indicated that women, the highly educated, the political left, those who donated for charity, those whose food choices were motivated by domestic origin and ethical food production, and those who trusted that consumption choices, institutional actors and the media can advance ethical food production and consumption, were most likely to be active in buycotting and boycotting. Buycotters/boycotters were very active in buying local food but less eager, for instance, to buy organic or Fair Trade products or to reduce the use of meat or milk. The article concludes by critically assessing the complex relationship between buycotting/boycotting and sustainable practices and suggesting that consumers may be more willing to transform their eating patterns if other societal actors, too, make an effort to influence ethical food consumption.",
keywords = "5141 Sociology, boycotting, buycotting, food, political consumption, Survey",
author = "Mari Niva and Piia Jallinoja",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "154",
pages = "349--360",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co",

}

Taking a stand through food choices? Characteristics of political food consumption and consumers in Finland. / Niva, Mari; Jallinoja, Piia.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 154, 12.2018, p. 349-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking a stand through food choices?

T2 - Characteristics of political food consumption and consumers in Finland

AU - Niva, Mari

AU - Jallinoja, Piia

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - This study looks at food as a realm of political consumption by examining buycotting and boycotting of foods for ethical, political or environmental reasons in Finland. The results of an Internet-based survey (N = 1021) showed that around half of the respondents often or occasionally both buycotted and boycotted foods. Multinomial regression models indicated that women, the highly educated, the political left, those who donated for charity, those whose food choices were motivated by domestic origin and ethical food production, and those who trusted that consumption choices, institutional actors and the media can advance ethical food production and consumption, were most likely to be active in buycotting and boycotting. Buycotters/boycotters were very active in buying local food but less eager, for instance, to buy organic or Fair Trade products or to reduce the use of meat or milk. The article concludes by critically assessing the complex relationship between buycotting/boycotting and sustainable practices and suggesting that consumers may be more willing to transform their eating patterns if other societal actors, too, make an effort to influence ethical food consumption.

AB - This study looks at food as a realm of political consumption by examining buycotting and boycotting of foods for ethical, political or environmental reasons in Finland. The results of an Internet-based survey (N = 1021) showed that around half of the respondents often or occasionally both buycotted and boycotted foods. Multinomial regression models indicated that women, the highly educated, the political left, those who donated for charity, those whose food choices were motivated by domestic origin and ethical food production, and those who trusted that consumption choices, institutional actors and the media can advance ethical food production and consumption, were most likely to be active in buycotting and boycotting. Buycotters/boycotters were very active in buying local food but less eager, for instance, to buy organic or Fair Trade products or to reduce the use of meat or milk. The article concludes by critically assessing the complex relationship between buycotting/boycotting and sustainable practices and suggesting that consumers may be more willing to transform their eating patterns if other societal actors, too, make an effort to influence ethical food consumption.

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - boycotting

KW - buycotting

KW - food

KW - political consumption

KW - Survey

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.013

M3 - Article

VL - 154

SP - 349

EP - 360

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -