The Cognitive Science of Religion: A Modified Theist Response

Aku Visala, David Leech

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Critics of religion have recently claimed that the natural explanation of religious-belief formation offered by the Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is incompatible with theism. Defenders of theism have in turn responded to these claims by arguing for the compatibility of the CSR account with theism. In this paper we propose a modified defence of the compatibility of the CSR account with theism which supplements extant theistic arguments by drawing out the implications of certain points about the nature of CSR explanation which have so far been left relatively unexploited. In developing this defence, we argue that extant atheistic and theistic readings of the CSR can be understood as accepting certain presuppositions, especially about the relative centrality of the CSR account in explaining religious belief, which, we argue, would be detrimental to the theist case were they actually intended, and which should be clearly rejected. We suggest that the theist should argue explicitly from the nature of CSR explanation to its compatibility with theism.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReligious Studies
Volume47
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)301-316
Number of pages16
ISSN0034-4125
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 611 Philosophy
  • theism
  • atheism
  • cognitive science
  • naturalistic theories of religion
  • explanation
  • 614 Theology
  • naturalistic theories of religion
  • atheism
  • cognitive science
  • evolution of religion

Cite this

Visala, Aku ; Leech, David. / The Cognitive Science of Religion : A Modified Theist Response. In: Religious Studies. 2011 ; Vol. 47, No. 3. pp. 301-316.
@article{860d3b36cbf54b2394973b54675a3baf,
title = "The Cognitive Science of Religion: A Modified Theist Response",
abstract = "Critics of religion have recently claimed that the natural explanation of religious-belief formation offered by the Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is incompatible with theism. Defenders of theism have in turn responded to these claims by arguing for the compatibility of the CSR account with theism. In this paper we propose a modified defence of the compatibility of the CSR account with theism which supplements extant theistic arguments by drawing out the implications of certain points about the nature of CSR explanation which have so far been left relatively unexploited. In developing this defence, we argue that extant atheistic and theistic readings of the CSR can be understood as accepting certain presuppositions, especially about the relative centrality of the CSR account in explaining religious belief, which, we argue, would be detrimental to the theist case were they actually intended, and which should be clearly rejected. We suggest that the theist should argue explicitly from the nature of CSR explanation to its compatibility with theism.",
keywords = "611 Philosophy, theism, atheism, cognitive science, naturalistic theories of religion, explanation, 614 Theology, naturalistic theories of religion, atheism, cognitive science, evolution of religion",
author = "Aku Visala and David Leech",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1017/S0034412510000302",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "301--316",
journal = "Religious Studies",
issn = "0034-4125",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

The Cognitive Science of Religion : A Modified Theist Response. / Visala, Aku; Leech, David.

In: Religious Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2011, p. 301-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Cognitive Science of Religion

T2 - A Modified Theist Response

AU - Visala, Aku

AU - Leech, David

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Critics of religion have recently claimed that the natural explanation of religious-belief formation offered by the Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is incompatible with theism. Defenders of theism have in turn responded to these claims by arguing for the compatibility of the CSR account with theism. In this paper we propose a modified defence of the compatibility of the CSR account with theism which supplements extant theistic arguments by drawing out the implications of certain points about the nature of CSR explanation which have so far been left relatively unexploited. In developing this defence, we argue that extant atheistic and theistic readings of the CSR can be understood as accepting certain presuppositions, especially about the relative centrality of the CSR account in explaining religious belief, which, we argue, would be detrimental to the theist case were they actually intended, and which should be clearly rejected. We suggest that the theist should argue explicitly from the nature of CSR explanation to its compatibility with theism.

AB - Critics of religion have recently claimed that the natural explanation of religious-belief formation offered by the Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is incompatible with theism. Defenders of theism have in turn responded to these claims by arguing for the compatibility of the CSR account with theism. In this paper we propose a modified defence of the compatibility of the CSR account with theism which supplements extant theistic arguments by drawing out the implications of certain points about the nature of CSR explanation which have so far been left relatively unexploited. In developing this defence, we argue that extant atheistic and theistic readings of the CSR can be understood as accepting certain presuppositions, especially about the relative centrality of the CSR account in explaining religious belief, which, we argue, would be detrimental to the theist case were they actually intended, and which should be clearly rejected. We suggest that the theist should argue explicitly from the nature of CSR explanation to its compatibility with theism.

KW - 611 Philosophy

KW - theism

KW - atheism

KW - cognitive science

KW - naturalistic theories of religion

KW - explanation

KW - 614 Theology

KW - naturalistic theories of religion

KW - atheism

KW - cognitive science

KW - evolution of religion

U2 - 10.1017/S0034412510000302

DO - 10.1017/S0034412510000302

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 301

EP - 316

JO - Religious Studies

JF - Religious Studies

SN - 0034-4125

IS - 3

ER -