The Philosophy and Epistemology of Simulation: A Review

Till Grune-Yanoff, Paul Weirich

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The philosophical literature on simulations has increased dramatically during the past 40 years. Many of its main topics are epistemological. For example, philosophers consider how the results of simulations help explain natural phenomena. This essay’s review treats mainly simulations in the social sciences. It considers the nature of simulations, the varieties of simulation, and uses of simulations for representation, prediction, explanation, and policy decisions. Being oriented toward philosophy of science, it compares simulations to models and experiments and considers whether simulations raise new methodological issues.The essay concludes that several features of simulations set them apart from models and experiments and make them novel scientific tools, whose powers and limits are not yet well understood.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSimulation & Gaming
Volume41
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)20-50
Number of pages31
ISSN1046-8781
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA2 Review article in a scientific journal

Fields of Science

  • 611 Philosophy

Cite this

@article{b28e08c1c1bc4503a2a2f3d45000ad03,
title = "The Philosophy and Epistemology of Simulation: A Review",
abstract = "The philosophical literature on simulations has increased dramatically during the past 40 years. Many of its main topics are epistemological. For example, philosophers consider how the results of simulations help explain natural phenomena. This essay’s review treats mainly simulations in the social sciences. It considers the nature of simulations, the varieties of simulation, and uses of simulations for representation, prediction, explanation, and policy decisions. Being oriented toward philosophy of science, it compares simulations to models and experiments and considers whether simulations raise new methodological issues.The essay concludes that several features of simulations set them apart from models and experiments and make them novel scientific tools, whose powers and limits are not yet well understood.",
keywords = "611 Philosophy",
author = "Till Grune-Yanoff and Paul Weirich",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1177/1046878109353470",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "20--50",
journal = "Simulation & Gaming",
issn = "1046-8781",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "1",

}

The Philosophy and Epistemology of Simulation : A Review. / Grune-Yanoff, Till; Weirich, Paul.

In: Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2010, p. 20-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Philosophy and Epistemology of Simulation

T2 - A Review

AU - Grune-Yanoff, Till

AU - Weirich, Paul

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The philosophical literature on simulations has increased dramatically during the past 40 years. Many of its main topics are epistemological. For example, philosophers consider how the results of simulations help explain natural phenomena. This essay’s review treats mainly simulations in the social sciences. It considers the nature of simulations, the varieties of simulation, and uses of simulations for representation, prediction, explanation, and policy decisions. Being oriented toward philosophy of science, it compares simulations to models and experiments and considers whether simulations raise new methodological issues.The essay concludes that several features of simulations set them apart from models and experiments and make them novel scientific tools, whose powers and limits are not yet well understood.

AB - The philosophical literature on simulations has increased dramatically during the past 40 years. Many of its main topics are epistemological. For example, philosophers consider how the results of simulations help explain natural phenomena. This essay’s review treats mainly simulations in the social sciences. It considers the nature of simulations, the varieties of simulation, and uses of simulations for representation, prediction, explanation, and policy decisions. Being oriented toward philosophy of science, it compares simulations to models and experiments and considers whether simulations raise new methodological issues.The essay concludes that several features of simulations set them apart from models and experiments and make them novel scientific tools, whose powers and limits are not yet well understood.

KW - 611 Philosophy

U2 - 10.1177/1046878109353470

DO - 10.1177/1046878109353470

M3 - Review Article

VL - 41

SP - 20

EP - 50

JO - Simulation & Gaming

JF - Simulation & Gaming

SN - 1046-8781

IS - 1

ER -