Towards trust management for cloud-based ecosystems

Sini Ruohomaa, Lea Kutvonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Inter-enterprise collaborations allow service providers to focus on their key competences while providing a composed service to end customers. The actors involved must determine whether the gains from participating outweigh the risks of depending on other autonomous collaboration participants, in order to make trust decisions on their willingness to collaborate. We define trust as the extent to which an actor is willing to participate in a given action with a given partner, considering the risks and incentives involved. In this paper, we present two high-level alternatives for trust management architectures for cloud-based service ecosystems: closed collaboration environments and open service ecosystems. Closed environments, such as traditional virtual organization breeding environments, are often built around a hub actor, centrally managed and apply pre-formed trust relationships in determining who is allowed into the breeding environment. Open service ecosystems, in contrast, allow service providers to enter the ecosystem by publishing a valid service offer, and trust relationships are formed and evolve within the ecosystem. We discuss the implications these choices have on further architecture refinement, and compare the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches, including their infrastructure needs, viability and ability to scale up in size.

(This paper is a discussion paper; it has public reviews but is not a part of the regular issues of Communications of Cloud Software.)
Original languageEnglish
JournalCommunications of Cloud Software
Volume2012
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 113 Computer and information sciences
  • trust management
  • cloud

Cite this

@article{ed04818330ff46c7937afedef6c01540,
title = "Towards trust management for cloud-based ecosystems",
abstract = "Inter-enterprise collaborations allow service providers to focus on their key competences while providing a composed service to end customers. The actors involved must determine whether the gains from participating outweigh the risks of depending on other autonomous collaboration participants, in order to make trust decisions on their willingness to collaborate. We define trust as the extent to which an actor is willing to participate in a given action with a given partner, considering the risks and incentives involved. In this paper, we present two high-level alternatives for trust management architectures for cloud-based service ecosystems: closed collaboration environments and open service ecosystems. Closed environments, such as traditional virtual organization breeding environments, are often built around a hub actor, centrally managed and apply pre-formed trust relationships in determining who is allowed into the breeding environment. Open service ecosystems, in contrast, allow service providers to enter the ecosystem by publishing a valid service offer, and trust relationships are formed and evolve within the ecosystem. We discuss the implications these choices have on further architecture refinement, and compare the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches, including their infrastructure needs, viability and ability to scale up in size.(This paper is a discussion paper; it has public reviews but is not a part of the regular issues of Communications of Cloud Software.)",
keywords = "113 Computer and information sciences, trust management, cloud",
author = "Sini Ruohomaa and Lea Kutvonen",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "2012",
journal = "Communications of Cloud Software",
issn = "2242-5403",
publisher = "TIVIT Cloud Software Finland",

}

Towards trust management for cloud-based ecosystems. / Ruohomaa, Sini; Kutvonen, Lea.

In: Communications of Cloud Software, Vol. 2012, 03.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards trust management for cloud-based ecosystems

AU - Ruohomaa, Sini

AU - Kutvonen, Lea

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Inter-enterprise collaborations allow service providers to focus on their key competences while providing a composed service to end customers. The actors involved must determine whether the gains from participating outweigh the risks of depending on other autonomous collaboration participants, in order to make trust decisions on their willingness to collaborate. We define trust as the extent to which an actor is willing to participate in a given action with a given partner, considering the risks and incentives involved. In this paper, we present two high-level alternatives for trust management architectures for cloud-based service ecosystems: closed collaboration environments and open service ecosystems. Closed environments, such as traditional virtual organization breeding environments, are often built around a hub actor, centrally managed and apply pre-formed trust relationships in determining who is allowed into the breeding environment. Open service ecosystems, in contrast, allow service providers to enter the ecosystem by publishing a valid service offer, and trust relationships are formed and evolve within the ecosystem. We discuss the implications these choices have on further architecture refinement, and compare the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches, including their infrastructure needs, viability and ability to scale up in size.(This paper is a discussion paper; it has public reviews but is not a part of the regular issues of Communications of Cloud Software.)

AB - Inter-enterprise collaborations allow service providers to focus on their key competences while providing a composed service to end customers. The actors involved must determine whether the gains from participating outweigh the risks of depending on other autonomous collaboration participants, in order to make trust decisions on their willingness to collaborate. We define trust as the extent to which an actor is willing to participate in a given action with a given partner, considering the risks and incentives involved. In this paper, we present two high-level alternatives for trust management architectures for cloud-based service ecosystems: closed collaboration environments and open service ecosystems. Closed environments, such as traditional virtual organization breeding environments, are often built around a hub actor, centrally managed and apply pre-formed trust relationships in determining who is allowed into the breeding environment. Open service ecosystems, in contrast, allow service providers to enter the ecosystem by publishing a valid service offer, and trust relationships are formed and evolve within the ecosystem. We discuss the implications these choices have on further architecture refinement, and compare the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches, including their infrastructure needs, viability and ability to scale up in size.(This paper is a discussion paper; it has public reviews but is not a part of the regular issues of Communications of Cloud Software.)

KW - 113 Computer and information sciences

KW - trust management

KW - cloud

M3 - Article

VL - 2012

JO - Communications of Cloud Software

JF - Communications of Cloud Software

SN - 2242-5403

ER -