Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Weird inflects but OK: Making sense of morphological generation errors

  • Kyle Gorman
  • , Arya D. McCarthy
  • , Ryan Cotterell
  • , Ekaterina Vylomova
  • , M. Silfverberg
  • , Magdalena Markowska

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We conduct a manual error analysis of the CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task on Morphological Reinflection. In this task, systems are given a word in citation form (e.g., hug) and asked to produce the corresponding inflected form (e.g., the simple past hugged). This design lets us analyze errors much like we might analyze children's production errors. We propose an error taxonomy and use it to annotate errors made by the top two systems across twelve languages. Many of the observed errors are related to inflectional patterns sensitive to inherent linguistic properties such as animacy or affect; many others are failures to predict truly unpredictable inflectional behaviors. We also find nearly one quarter of the residual "errors" reflect errors in the gold data. © 2019 Association for Computational Linguistics.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCoNLL 2019 - 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings of the Conference
EditorsMohit Bansal, Aline Villavicencio
Number of pages12
Place of PublicationStroudsburg, PA
PublisherThe Association for Computational Linguistics
Publication date2019
Pages140-151
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-950737-72-7
Publication statusPublished - 2019
MoE publication typeA4 Article in conference proceedings
EventConference on Computational Natural Language Learning - Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Duration: 3 Nov 20194 Nov 2019
Conference number: 23
https://www.conll.org/2019

Fields of Science

  • Animacy
  • Error taxonomy
  • Linguistic properties
  • Errors
  • 113 Computer and information sciences
  • 6121 Languages

Cite this