What are historical sociolinguistics?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper takes a look at recent shifts in sociolinguistic paradigms and considers their applications to historical sociolinguistic research. Besides growth areas such as multilingualism, a current trend is convergence of established approaches. My discussion focuses on those that go even further, bridging the gap between macro- and micro-levels of analysis in the historical context of study. Presented as interdependent levels, layers or domains of analysis, these models usually imply that the analyst needs to cross boundaries between established sociolinguistic paradigms when moving from one level of analysis to another. From the analyst’s perspective the issues include the layered simultaneity of the multiple contexts present at any given point in time and the ways in which their chronologies stretch over time and space. I discuss the reconstruction of macro- and micro-contexts and their interdependence by presenting a case study of Samuel Pepys, a seventeenth-century English naval administrator. I conclude by advocating both informational maximalism and an empirical baseline for such studies. Digital humanities will no doubt facilitate this research in the future.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Historical Sociolinguistics
Volume1
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)243–269
Number of pages26
ISSN2199-2894
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fields of Science

  • 6121 Languages
  • sociolinguistic paradigms
  • baseline information
  • ego-documents
  • layered simultaneity
  • Restoration England

Cite this

@article{1770bf41209b4839a7358be573d6379b,
title = "What are historical sociolinguistics?",
abstract = "This paper takes a look at recent shifts in sociolinguistic paradigms and considers their applications to historical sociolinguistic research. Besides growth areas such as multilingualism, a current trend is convergence of established approaches. My discussion focuses on those that go even further, bridging the gap between macro- and micro-levels of analysis in the historical context of study. Presented as interdependent levels, layers or domains of analysis, these models usually imply that the analyst needs to cross boundaries between established sociolinguistic paradigms when moving from one level of analysis to another. From the analyst’s perspective the issues include the layered simultaneity of the multiple contexts present at any given point in time and the ways in which their chronologies stretch over time and space. I discuss the reconstruction of macro- and micro-contexts and their interdependence by presenting a case study of Samuel Pepys, a seventeenth-century English naval administrator. I conclude by advocating both informational maximalism and an empirical baseline for such studies. Digital humanities will no doubt facilitate this research in the future.",
keywords = "6121 Languages, sociolinguistic paradigms, baseline information, ego-documents, layered simultaneity, Restoration England",
author = "Terttu Nevalainen",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "28",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "243–269",
journal = "Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics",
issn = "2199-2894",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
number = "2",

}

What are historical sociolinguistics? / Nevalainen, Terttu.

In: Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 28.08.2015, p. 243–269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What are historical sociolinguistics?

AU - Nevalainen, Terttu

PY - 2015/8/28

Y1 - 2015/8/28

N2 - This paper takes a look at recent shifts in sociolinguistic paradigms and considers their applications to historical sociolinguistic research. Besides growth areas such as multilingualism, a current trend is convergence of established approaches. My discussion focuses on those that go even further, bridging the gap between macro- and micro-levels of analysis in the historical context of study. Presented as interdependent levels, layers or domains of analysis, these models usually imply that the analyst needs to cross boundaries between established sociolinguistic paradigms when moving from one level of analysis to another. From the analyst’s perspective the issues include the layered simultaneity of the multiple contexts present at any given point in time and the ways in which their chronologies stretch over time and space. I discuss the reconstruction of macro- and micro-contexts and their interdependence by presenting a case study of Samuel Pepys, a seventeenth-century English naval administrator. I conclude by advocating both informational maximalism and an empirical baseline for such studies. Digital humanities will no doubt facilitate this research in the future.

AB - This paper takes a look at recent shifts in sociolinguistic paradigms and considers their applications to historical sociolinguistic research. Besides growth areas such as multilingualism, a current trend is convergence of established approaches. My discussion focuses on those that go even further, bridging the gap between macro- and micro-levels of analysis in the historical context of study. Presented as interdependent levels, layers or domains of analysis, these models usually imply that the analyst needs to cross boundaries between established sociolinguistic paradigms when moving from one level of analysis to another. From the analyst’s perspective the issues include the layered simultaneity of the multiple contexts present at any given point in time and the ways in which their chronologies stretch over time and space. I discuss the reconstruction of macro- and micro-contexts and their interdependence by presenting a case study of Samuel Pepys, a seventeenth-century English naval administrator. I conclude by advocating both informational maximalism and an empirical baseline for such studies. Digital humanities will no doubt facilitate this research in the future.

KW - 6121 Languages

KW - sociolinguistic paradigms

KW - baseline information

KW - ego-documents

KW - layered simultaneity

KW - Restoration England

UR - http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jhsl.2015.1.issue-2/jhsl-2015-0014/jhsl-2015-0014.xml?format=INT

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 243

EP - 269

JO - Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics

JF - Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics

SN - 2199-2894

IS - 2

ER -