World history looks at events and processes whose magnitude reaches far beyond local, national or even continental histories. Such broader accounts are typically centred on European or Western ideas of how history is to be written, both in terms of the spatial origo of the events and processes viewed, and with regard to the concepts used for their explanation. Against this backdrop, more and more voices can be heard pleading a non-Western-centred approach to global history. Scholars working within many different approaches have uttered their concern. Post-colonial theories have long drawn attention to the inadequacy underlying much Western writing on the exotic Other—from Edward Said’s Orientalism (1978) to Dipesh Chakrabarty’s proposal of Provincialising Europe (2001).

Africa’s position with regard to these considerations is strangely ambivalent. Africa has long been globally connected and her fate is often depicted as an immediate result of global political, commercial, and military factors. African historiography reflects this in peculiar ways. World histories tend to relegate Africa to the status of a continent that reacts. In contrast, “authentically African” history is more often than not understood as local, at best regional, and only relatively few grand narratives on long-term African history at a broader geographical level have been attempted. A methodological concern enhanced the divide. While global histories, including those paying a good deal of attention to Africa, tend to rely on the kind of sources known from its European tradition, local historiographies and accounts of pre-colonial African history are mainly based on linguistic and archaeological data.

The Global translations project – which began with an investigation of Asian conceptualisations of the social and the economic, and which now proceeds with a focus on the corresponding African terminology – had set out to develop ideas towards establishing a horizon that “is not one where the Asian or African conceptualisations are played off against the European but one where European, Asian and African semantics are entangled in historical processes. A frequent argument in the postcolonial critique deals with a continuous Eurocentric agenda and that therefore full autonomy must be based on interruption of communication under development of indigenous discourse. The project wants to challenge this argument and search for possibilities of a non-Eurocentric transcultural dialogue.
Todellinen alku/loppupvm01/06/201231/03/2014


  • 615 Historia ja arkeologia
  • 6121 Kielitieteet