A novel measure of reliability in Diffusion Tensor Imaging after data rejections due to subject motion

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is commonly challenged by subject motion during data acquisition, which often leads to corrupted image data. Currently used procedure in DTI analysis is to correct or completely reject such data before tensor estimations, however assessing the reliability and accuracy of the estimated tensor in such situations has evaded previous studies. This work aims to define the loss of data accuracy with increasing image rejections, and to define a robust method for assessing reliability of the result at voxel level. We carried out simulations of every possible sub-scheme (N=1,073,567,387) of Jones30 gradient scheme, followed by confirming the idea with MRI data from four newborn and three adult subjects. We assessed the relative error of the most commonly used tensor estimates for DTI and tractography studies, fractional anisotropy (FA) and the major orientation vector (V1), respectively. The error was estimated using two measures, the widely used electric potential (EP) criteria as well as the rotationally variant condition number (CN). Our results show that CN and EP are comparable in situations with very few rejections, but CN becomes clearly more sensitive to depicting errors when more gradient vectors and images were rejected. The error in FA and V1 was also found depend on the actual FA level in the given voxel; low actual FA levels were related to high relative errors in the FA and V1 estimates. Finally, the results were confirmed with clinical MRI data. This showed that the errors after rejections are, indeed, inhomogeneous across brain regions. The FA and V1 errors become progressively larger when moving from the thick white matter bundles towards more superficial subcortical structures. Our findings suggest that i) CN is a useful estimator of data reliability at voxel level, and ii) DTI preprocessing with data rejections leads to major challenges when assessing brain tissue with lower FA levels, such as all newborn brain, as well as the adult superficial, subcortical areas commonly traced in precise connectivity analyses between cortical regions.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiNeuroImage
Vuosikerta147
Sivut57-65
Sivumäärä9
ISSN1053-8119
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 15 helmikuuta 2017
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 3112 Neurotieteet
  • 114 Fysiikka

Lainaa tätä

@article{e03276976b5048149d4d320c6b2a98ad,
title = "A novel measure of reliability in Diffusion Tensor Imaging after data rejections due to subject motion",
abstract = "Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is commonly challenged by subject motion during data acquisition, which often leads to corrupted image data. Currently used procedure in DTI analysis is to correct or completely reject such data before tensor estimations, however assessing the reliability and accuracy of the estimated tensor in such situations has evaded previous studies. This work aims to define the loss of data accuracy with increasing image rejections, and to define a robust method for assessing reliability of the result at voxel level. We carried out simulations of every possible sub-scheme (N=1,073,567,387) of Jones30 gradient scheme, followed by confirming the idea with MRI data from four newborn and three adult subjects. We assessed the relative error of the most commonly used tensor estimates for DTI and tractography studies, fractional anisotropy (FA) and the major orientation vector (V1), respectively. The error was estimated using two measures, the widely used electric potential (EP) criteria as well as the rotationally variant condition number (CN). Our results show that CN and EP are comparable in situations with very few rejections, but CN becomes clearly more sensitive to depicting errors when more gradient vectors and images were rejected. The error in FA and V1 was also found depend on the actual FA level in the given voxel; low actual FA levels were related to high relative errors in the FA and V1 estimates. Finally, the results were confirmed with clinical MRI data. This showed that the errors after rejections are, indeed, inhomogeneous across brain regions. The FA and V1 errors become progressively larger when moving from the thick white matter bundles towards more superficial subcortical structures. Our findings suggest that i) CN is a useful estimator of data reliability at voxel level, and ii) DTI preprocessing with data rejections leads to major challenges when assessing brain tissue with lower FA levels, such as all newborn brain, as well as the adult superficial, subcortical areas commonly traced in precise connectivity analyses between cortical regions.",
keywords = "3112 Neurosciences, 114 Physical sciences, diffusion, MRI",
author = "Viljami Sairanen and Linda Kuusela and Outi Sipil{\"a} and Sauli Savolainen and Sampsa Vanhatalo",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.061",
language = "English",
volume = "147",
pages = "57--65",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",

}

A novel measure of reliability in Diffusion Tensor Imaging after data rejections due to subject motion. / Sairanen, Viljami; Kuusela, Linda; Sipilä, Outi; Savolainen, Sauli; Vanhatalo, Sampsa.

julkaisussa: NeuroImage, Vuosikerta 147, 15.02.2017, s. 57-65.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel measure of reliability in Diffusion Tensor Imaging after data rejections due to subject motion

AU - Sairanen, Viljami

AU - Kuusela, Linda

AU - Sipilä, Outi

AU - Savolainen, Sauli

AU - Vanhatalo, Sampsa

PY - 2017/2/15

Y1 - 2017/2/15

N2 - Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is commonly challenged by subject motion during data acquisition, which often leads to corrupted image data. Currently used procedure in DTI analysis is to correct or completely reject such data before tensor estimations, however assessing the reliability and accuracy of the estimated tensor in such situations has evaded previous studies. This work aims to define the loss of data accuracy with increasing image rejections, and to define a robust method for assessing reliability of the result at voxel level. We carried out simulations of every possible sub-scheme (N=1,073,567,387) of Jones30 gradient scheme, followed by confirming the idea with MRI data from four newborn and three adult subjects. We assessed the relative error of the most commonly used tensor estimates for DTI and tractography studies, fractional anisotropy (FA) and the major orientation vector (V1), respectively. The error was estimated using two measures, the widely used electric potential (EP) criteria as well as the rotationally variant condition number (CN). Our results show that CN and EP are comparable in situations with very few rejections, but CN becomes clearly more sensitive to depicting errors when more gradient vectors and images were rejected. The error in FA and V1 was also found depend on the actual FA level in the given voxel; low actual FA levels were related to high relative errors in the FA and V1 estimates. Finally, the results were confirmed with clinical MRI data. This showed that the errors after rejections are, indeed, inhomogeneous across brain regions. The FA and V1 errors become progressively larger when moving from the thick white matter bundles towards more superficial subcortical structures. Our findings suggest that i) CN is a useful estimator of data reliability at voxel level, and ii) DTI preprocessing with data rejections leads to major challenges when assessing brain tissue with lower FA levels, such as all newborn brain, as well as the adult superficial, subcortical areas commonly traced in precise connectivity analyses between cortical regions.

AB - Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is commonly challenged by subject motion during data acquisition, which often leads to corrupted image data. Currently used procedure in DTI analysis is to correct or completely reject such data before tensor estimations, however assessing the reliability and accuracy of the estimated tensor in such situations has evaded previous studies. This work aims to define the loss of data accuracy with increasing image rejections, and to define a robust method for assessing reliability of the result at voxel level. We carried out simulations of every possible sub-scheme (N=1,073,567,387) of Jones30 gradient scheme, followed by confirming the idea with MRI data from four newborn and three adult subjects. We assessed the relative error of the most commonly used tensor estimates for DTI and tractography studies, fractional anisotropy (FA) and the major orientation vector (V1), respectively. The error was estimated using two measures, the widely used electric potential (EP) criteria as well as the rotationally variant condition number (CN). Our results show that CN and EP are comparable in situations with very few rejections, but CN becomes clearly more sensitive to depicting errors when more gradient vectors and images were rejected. The error in FA and V1 was also found depend on the actual FA level in the given voxel; low actual FA levels were related to high relative errors in the FA and V1 estimates. Finally, the results were confirmed with clinical MRI data. This showed that the errors after rejections are, indeed, inhomogeneous across brain regions. The FA and V1 errors become progressively larger when moving from the thick white matter bundles towards more superficial subcortical structures. Our findings suggest that i) CN is a useful estimator of data reliability at voxel level, and ii) DTI preprocessing with data rejections leads to major challenges when assessing brain tissue with lower FA levels, such as all newborn brain, as well as the adult superficial, subcortical areas commonly traced in precise connectivity analyses between cortical regions.

KW - 3112 Neurosciences

KW - 114 Physical sciences

KW - diffusion

KW - MRI

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.061

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.061

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 57

EP - 65

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -