Animal ethical views and perception of animal pain in veterinary students

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Veterinary students face several ethical challenges during their curriculum. We used the Animal Ethics Dilemma to study animal ethical views of Finnish veterinary students, and also asked them to score the level of pain perception in 13 different species. Based on the 218 respondents, the utilitarian view was the dominating ethical view. Mammals were given higher pain scores than other animals. The proportion of the respect for nature view correlated negatively, and that of the animal rights view positively, with most animal pain scores. Fifth year students had a higher percentage of contractarian view, as compared to 1st and 3rd year students, but this might have been confounded by their age. Several pain perception scorings increased with increasing study year. We conclude that the utilitarian view was clearly dominating, and that ethical views differed only slightly between students at different stages of their studies. Higher pain perception scorings in students at a later stage of their studies might reflect an increased knowledge of animal capacities.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
Artikkeli220
LehtiAnimals
Vuosikerta8
Numero12
Sivumäärä9
ISSN2076-2615
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 23 marraskuuta 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 413 Eläinlääketiede

Lainaa tätä

@article{48d96e39e3f444efb79590e300be646a,
title = "Animal ethical views and perception of animal pain in veterinary students",
abstract = "Veterinary students face several ethical challenges during their curriculum. We used the Animal Ethics Dilemma to study animal ethical views of Finnish veterinary students, and also asked them to score the level of pain perception in 13 different species. Based on the 218 respondents, the utilitarian view was the dominating ethical view. Mammals were given higher pain scores than other animals. The proportion of the respect for nature view correlated negatively, and that of the animal rights view positively, with most animal pain scores. Fifth year students had a higher percentage of contractarian view, as compared to 1st and 3rd year students, but this might have been confounded by their age. Several pain perception scorings increased with increasing study year. We conclude that the utilitarian view was clearly dominating, and that ethical views differed only slightly between students at different stages of their studies. Higher pain perception scorings in students at a later stage of their studies might reflect an increased knowledge of animal capacities.",
keywords = "413 Veterinary science, animal ethics, PAIN PERCEPTION, veterinary student, Animal welfare, animal",
author = "Valros, {Anna Elisabet} and H{\"a}nninen, {Laura Talvikki}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.3390/ani8120220",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Animals",
issn = "2076-2615",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "12",

}

Animal ethical views and perception of animal pain in veterinary students. / Valros, Anna Elisabet; Hänninen, Laura Talvikki.

julkaisussa: Animals, Vuosikerta 8, Nro 12, 220, 23.11.2018.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animal ethical views and perception of animal pain in veterinary students

AU - Valros, Anna Elisabet

AU - Hänninen, Laura Talvikki

PY - 2018/11/23

Y1 - 2018/11/23

N2 - Veterinary students face several ethical challenges during their curriculum. We used the Animal Ethics Dilemma to study animal ethical views of Finnish veterinary students, and also asked them to score the level of pain perception in 13 different species. Based on the 218 respondents, the utilitarian view was the dominating ethical view. Mammals were given higher pain scores than other animals. The proportion of the respect for nature view correlated negatively, and that of the animal rights view positively, with most animal pain scores. Fifth year students had a higher percentage of contractarian view, as compared to 1st and 3rd year students, but this might have been confounded by their age. Several pain perception scorings increased with increasing study year. We conclude that the utilitarian view was clearly dominating, and that ethical views differed only slightly between students at different stages of their studies. Higher pain perception scorings in students at a later stage of their studies might reflect an increased knowledge of animal capacities.

AB - Veterinary students face several ethical challenges during their curriculum. We used the Animal Ethics Dilemma to study animal ethical views of Finnish veterinary students, and also asked them to score the level of pain perception in 13 different species. Based on the 218 respondents, the utilitarian view was the dominating ethical view. Mammals were given higher pain scores than other animals. The proportion of the respect for nature view correlated negatively, and that of the animal rights view positively, with most animal pain scores. Fifth year students had a higher percentage of contractarian view, as compared to 1st and 3rd year students, but this might have been confounded by their age. Several pain perception scorings increased with increasing study year. We conclude that the utilitarian view was clearly dominating, and that ethical views differed only slightly between students at different stages of their studies. Higher pain perception scorings in students at a later stage of their studies might reflect an increased knowledge of animal capacities.

KW - 413 Veterinary science

KW - animal ethics

KW - PAIN PERCEPTION

KW - veterinary student

KW - Animal welfare

KW - animal

U2 - 10.3390/ani8120220

DO - 10.3390/ani8120220

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Animals

JF - Animals

SN - 2076-2615

IS - 12

M1 - 220

ER -