Abstrakti
In this article we aim at disclosing the relation between argumentation and critical-
collaborative management materialized in formative spaces. Such spaces are
shaped by intentional chains of activities for the creative development of
participants from the school context (teacher educators, principals, pedagogical
coordinators, teachers, students and parents). The concept of critical-
collaborative management is based on Magalhães’ studies (1991 - 2014) on
Critical Collaboration Research. We understand argumentation as multiple voices
that collide, reinforce, contrast, depart and approach in an attempt to create
multicultural, critical, cognitive, affective, and creative possibilities (LIBERALI,2013). The selected data refer to a meeting with consultant researchers, teacher
educators and coordinators in a Regional Board of Education in the city of São
Paulo. The argumentative discourse analysis that materializes the formative
activity points out the conflict of ideas, the possibility of sustained choices and
the desire to reach an agreement as central to critical-collaborative management
constitution.
collaborative management materialized in formative spaces. Such spaces are
shaped by intentional chains of activities for the creative development of
participants from the school context (teacher educators, principals, pedagogical
coordinators, teachers, students and parents). The concept of critical-
collaborative management is based on Magalhães’ studies (1991 - 2014) on
Critical Collaboration Research. We understand argumentation as multiple voices
that collide, reinforce, contrast, depart and approach in an attempt to create
multicultural, critical, cognitive, affective, and creative possibilities (LIBERALI,2013). The selected data refer to a meeting with consultant researchers, teacher
educators and coordinators in a Regional Board of Education in the city of São
Paulo. The argumentative discourse analysis that materializes the formative
activity points out the conflict of ideas, the possibility of sustained choices and
the desire to reach an agreement as central to critical-collaborative management
constitution.
| Julkaisun otsikon käännös | Argumentation as basis for a critical collaborative management |
|---|---|
| Alkuperäiskieli | portugali |
| Otsikko | Proceedings of the third international seminar on studies about discourse and argumentation (III SEDiAr) : Anais do III Seminário Internacional de Estudos sobre Discurso e Argumentação (III SEDiAr) |
| Toimittajat | Eduardo Piris, Isabel Azevedo, Geralda Lima |
| Sivumäärä | 12 |
| Vuosikerta | 1 |
| Julkaisupaikka | Santa Cruz |
| Kustantaja | EDITUS |
| Julkaisupäivä | 2016 |
| Sivut | 1632-1644 |
| ISBN (painettu) | 978-85-7455-409-9 |
| Tila | Julkaistu - 2016 |
| OKM-julkaisutyyppi | B3 Vertaisarvioimaton artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa |
| Tapahtuma | International Seminar on Studies about Discourse and Argumentation - Santa Cruz, Brasilia Kesto: 30 toukok. 2016 → 31 toukok. 2016 Konferenssinumero: 3 |
Lisätietoja
Proceeding volume: 1
Tieteenalat
- 516 Kasvatustieteet