TY - JOUR
T1 - Ascending aortic replacement versus aortic root replacement in patients with type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root
AU - Biancari, Fausto
AU - Gatti, Giuseppe
AU - Mäkikallio, Timo
AU - Juvonen, Tatu
AU - Mariscalco, Giovanni
AU - El-Dean, Zein
AU - Pettinari, Matteo
AU - Rodriguez Lega, Javier
AU - Perrotti, Andrea
AU - Onorati, Francesco
AU - Wisniewki, Konrad
AU - Demal, Till
AU - Kacer, Petr
AU - Perna, Dario Di
AU - Vendramin, Igor
AU - Rinaldi, Mauro
AU - Ferrante, Luisa
AU - Quintana, Eduard
AU - Buech, Joscha
AU - Radner, Caroline
AU - Fiore, Antonio
AU - Dell’Aquila, Angelo M.
AU - D’Errigo, Paola
AU - Rosato, Stefano
AU - Polvani, Gianluca
AU - Peterss, Sven
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Extensive surgical resection of the thoracic aorta in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is thought to reduce the risk of late aortic wall degeneration and the need for repeat aortic operations. Objectives: We evaluated the early and late outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root. Design: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Methods: The outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, that is dissection flap located at least in one of the Valsava segments, were herein evaluated. In-hospital mortality, neurological complications, dialysis as well as 10-year repeat proximal aortic operation, and mortality were the outcomes of this study. Results: Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement was performed in 198 patients and aortic root replacement in 215 patients. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 4.0 years, 19 patients underwent 22 repeat procedures on the aortic root and/or aortic valve. No operative death occurred after these reinterventions. The risk of proximal aortic reoperation was significantly lower in patients who underwent aortic root replacement (5.5% vs 12.9%, adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio (SHR) 0.085, 95% CI 0.022–0.329). Aortic root replacement was associated with higher rates of in-hospital (14.4% vs 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio 2.192, 95% CI 1.000–4.807) and 10-year mortality (44.5% vs 30.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.216, 95% CI 1.338–3.671). Postoperative neurological complications and dialysis rates were comparable in the study groups. Conclusion: Among patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, its replacement was associated with a significantly lower rate of repeat proximal aortic operation of any type compared to supracoronary aortic replacement. Still, aortic root replacement seems to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04831073 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04831073).
AB - Background: Extensive surgical resection of the thoracic aorta in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is thought to reduce the risk of late aortic wall degeneration and the need for repeat aortic operations. Objectives: We evaluated the early and late outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root. Design: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Methods: The outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, that is dissection flap located at least in one of the Valsava segments, were herein evaluated. In-hospital mortality, neurological complications, dialysis as well as 10-year repeat proximal aortic operation, and mortality were the outcomes of this study. Results: Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement was performed in 198 patients and aortic root replacement in 215 patients. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 4.0 years, 19 patients underwent 22 repeat procedures on the aortic root and/or aortic valve. No operative death occurred after these reinterventions. The risk of proximal aortic reoperation was significantly lower in patients who underwent aortic root replacement (5.5% vs 12.9%, adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio (SHR) 0.085, 95% CI 0.022–0.329). Aortic root replacement was associated with higher rates of in-hospital (14.4% vs 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio 2.192, 95% CI 1.000–4.807) and 10-year mortality (44.5% vs 30.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.216, 95% CI 1.338–3.671). Postoperative neurological complications and dialysis rates were comparable in the study groups. Conclusion: Among patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, its replacement was associated with a significantly lower rate of repeat proximal aortic operation of any type compared to supracoronary aortic replacement. Still, aortic root replacement seems to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04831073 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04831073).
KW - aortic dissection
KW - aortic root
KW - Bentall procedure
KW - David procedure
KW - reoperation
KW - type A aortic dissection
KW - 3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology
U2 - 10.1177/17539447241303408
DO - 10.1177/17539447241303408
M3 - Article
C2 - 39840731
AN - SCOPUS:85216331080
SN - 1753-9447
VL - 19
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
M1 - 17539447241303408
ER -