B2B unfair trade practices and EU competition law

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

EU competition law appears to interpret fairness in B2B trade relations as "equal opportunities to trade" for market actors. A positive and pragmatic inquiry into the relevant regulations, cases and doctrines support that approach. This contribution suggests a new definition for these practices under EU competition law. Accordingly, any trade practice representing supremacy in bargaining power - usually dominance - and distorting the equal opportunity to trade of one or more trading partners could be conceived as unfair trade practices (UTPs) under EU competition law. Thus, these practices restrict competition according to EU competition law. Indeed, the EU Commission, Parliament and many Member States have emphasized the restrictive effects of UTPs even when practised by non-dominant undertakings. UTPs could include all kinds of trade practices toward trading partners, regardless of the industry and environment in which they occur, whether online or offline. This definition can also relieve competition lawyers from inefficient exploitative/exclusionary abusive conduct divisions.© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiEuropean Competition Journal
Vuosikerta14
Numero2-3
Sivut305-341
Sivumäärä37
ISSN1744-1056
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2018
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 513 Oikeustiede

Lainaa tätä

@article{07f59cb9c7d847eca572e7adb4a994a0,
title = "B2B unfair trade practices and EU competition law",
abstract = "EU competition law appears to interpret fairness in B2B trade relations as {"}equal opportunities to trade{"} for market actors. A positive and pragmatic inquiry into the relevant regulations, cases and doctrines support that approach. This contribution suggests a new definition for these practices under EU competition law. Accordingly, any trade practice representing supremacy in bargaining power - usually dominance - and distorting the equal opportunity to trade of one or more trading partners could be conceived as unfair trade practices (UTPs) under EU competition law. Thus, these practices restrict competition according to EU competition law. Indeed, the EU Commission, Parliament and many Member States have emphasized the restrictive effects of UTPs even when practised by non-dominant undertakings. UTPs could include all kinds of trade practices toward trading partners, regardless of the industry and environment in which they occur, whether online or offline. This definition can also relieve competition lawyers from inefficient exploitative/exclusionary abusive conduct divisions.{\circledC} 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
keywords = "513 Law",
author = "{Abdollah Dehdashti}, S.",
note = "cited By 0",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/17441056.2018.1520439",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "305--341",
journal = "European Competition Journal",
issn = "1744-1056",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2-3",

}

B2B unfair trade practices and EU competition law. / Abdollah Dehdashti, S.

julkaisussa: European Competition Journal, Vuosikerta 14, Nro 2-3, 2018, s. 305-341.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - B2B unfair trade practices and EU competition law

AU - Abdollah Dehdashti, S.

N1 - cited By 0

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - EU competition law appears to interpret fairness in B2B trade relations as "equal opportunities to trade" for market actors. A positive and pragmatic inquiry into the relevant regulations, cases and doctrines support that approach. This contribution suggests a new definition for these practices under EU competition law. Accordingly, any trade practice representing supremacy in bargaining power - usually dominance - and distorting the equal opportunity to trade of one or more trading partners could be conceived as unfair trade practices (UTPs) under EU competition law. Thus, these practices restrict competition according to EU competition law. Indeed, the EU Commission, Parliament and many Member States have emphasized the restrictive effects of UTPs even when practised by non-dominant undertakings. UTPs could include all kinds of trade practices toward trading partners, regardless of the industry and environment in which they occur, whether online or offline. This definition can also relieve competition lawyers from inefficient exploitative/exclusionary abusive conduct divisions.© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

AB - EU competition law appears to interpret fairness in B2B trade relations as "equal opportunities to trade" for market actors. A positive and pragmatic inquiry into the relevant regulations, cases and doctrines support that approach. This contribution suggests a new definition for these practices under EU competition law. Accordingly, any trade practice representing supremacy in bargaining power - usually dominance - and distorting the equal opportunity to trade of one or more trading partners could be conceived as unfair trade practices (UTPs) under EU competition law. Thus, these practices restrict competition according to EU competition law. Indeed, the EU Commission, Parliament and many Member States have emphasized the restrictive effects of UTPs even when practised by non-dominant undertakings. UTPs could include all kinds of trade practices toward trading partners, regardless of the industry and environment in which they occur, whether online or offline. This definition can also relieve competition lawyers from inefficient exploitative/exclusionary abusive conduct divisions.© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

KW - 513 Law

U2 - 10.1080/17441056.2018.1520439

DO - 10.1080/17441056.2018.1520439

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 305

EP - 341

JO - European Competition Journal

JF - European Competition Journal

SN - 1744-1056

IS - 2-3

ER -