"Black Spots on the Map of Europe"

Ireland and Finland as oppressed nationalities, c.1860–1910

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

In late 1909, the liberal Russian newspaper Birzhevye Vedomosti expressed the fear that Finland could become “Russia’s Ireland.” The implication was that by restricting the autonomy that Finland has enjoyed within the Russian Empire for much of the preceding century, Russian nationalists risked creating a chaotic, discontented eastern province, dangerously close to the imperial capital. The “Russia’s Ireland” motif became so prominent in the following eight years – before Finland got independence in 1917 – as to become an international cliché. The discourse of imperial subjugation that existed in both Ireland and Finland in the first decade of the twentieth century has rather obscured the fact that, despite obvious superficial parallels, the nineteenth century experiences of these nations differed considerably. Both Finland and Ireland were part of larger imperial systems in the nineteenth century, and national movements developed in both countries that sought to develop political, economic and cultural autonomy. Finland became a regularly-employed model for Irish national aspirations, but the analogy was rejected consistently, and often vigorously, by Finns in the nineteenth century. This article charts the development of the Finnish-Irish constitutional analogy from the middle of the nineteenth century to the eve of both nations’ independence. It demonstrates that despite the similarities in overall historical timelines, contemporaries perceived differences between the two cases.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiIrish Historical Studies
Vuosikerta41
Numero160
Sivut186-205
Sivumäärä20
ISSN0021-1214
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2017
Julkaistu ulkoisestiKyllä
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Lisätietoja

Special issue: Ireland and Finland, 1860–1930: Comparative and Transnational Histories.

Tieteenalat

  • 615 Historia ja arkeologia

Lainaa tätä

@article{3d366cc3a39044bbb441b17e8be25ad7,
title = "{"}Black Spots on the Map of Europe{"}: Ireland and Finland as oppressed nationalities, c.1860–1910",
abstract = "In late 1909, the liberal Russian newspaper Birzhevye Vedomosti expressed the fear that Finland could become “Russia’s Ireland.” The implication was that by restricting the autonomy that Finland has enjoyed within the Russian Empire for much of the preceding century, Russian nationalists risked creating a chaotic, discontented eastern province, dangerously close to the imperial capital. The “Russia’s Ireland” motif became so prominent in the following eight years – before Finland got independence in 1917 – as to become an international clich{\'e}. The discourse of imperial subjugation that existed in both Ireland and Finland in the first decade of the twentieth century has rather obscured the fact that, despite obvious superficial parallels, the nineteenth century experiences of these nations differed considerably. Both Finland and Ireland were part of larger imperial systems in the nineteenth century, and national movements developed in both countries that sought to develop political, economic and cultural autonomy. Finland became a regularly-employed model for Irish national aspirations, but the analogy was rejected consistently, and often vigorously, by Finns in the nineteenth century. This article charts the development of the Finnish-Irish constitutional analogy from the middle of the nineteenth century to the eve of both nations’ independence. It demonstrates that despite the similarities in overall historical timelines, contemporaries perceived differences between the two cases.",
keywords = "615 History and Archaeology",
author = "Newby, {Andrew G.}",
note = "Special issue: Ireland and Finland, 1860–1930: Comparative and Transnational Histories.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1017/ihs.2017.31",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "186--205",
journal = "Irish Historical Studies",
issn = "0021-1214",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "160",

}

"Black Spots on the Map of Europe" : Ireland and Finland as oppressed nationalities, c.1860–1910. / Newby, Andrew G. .

julkaisussa: Irish Historical Studies, Vuosikerta 41, Nro 160 , 2017, s. 186-205.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Black Spots on the Map of Europe"

T2 - Ireland and Finland as oppressed nationalities, c.1860–1910

AU - Newby, Andrew G.

N1 - Special issue: Ireland and Finland, 1860–1930: Comparative and Transnational Histories.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In late 1909, the liberal Russian newspaper Birzhevye Vedomosti expressed the fear that Finland could become “Russia’s Ireland.” The implication was that by restricting the autonomy that Finland has enjoyed within the Russian Empire for much of the preceding century, Russian nationalists risked creating a chaotic, discontented eastern province, dangerously close to the imperial capital. The “Russia’s Ireland” motif became so prominent in the following eight years – before Finland got independence in 1917 – as to become an international cliché. The discourse of imperial subjugation that existed in both Ireland and Finland in the first decade of the twentieth century has rather obscured the fact that, despite obvious superficial parallels, the nineteenth century experiences of these nations differed considerably. Both Finland and Ireland were part of larger imperial systems in the nineteenth century, and national movements developed in both countries that sought to develop political, economic and cultural autonomy. Finland became a regularly-employed model for Irish national aspirations, but the analogy was rejected consistently, and often vigorously, by Finns in the nineteenth century. This article charts the development of the Finnish-Irish constitutional analogy from the middle of the nineteenth century to the eve of both nations’ independence. It demonstrates that despite the similarities in overall historical timelines, contemporaries perceived differences between the two cases.

AB - In late 1909, the liberal Russian newspaper Birzhevye Vedomosti expressed the fear that Finland could become “Russia’s Ireland.” The implication was that by restricting the autonomy that Finland has enjoyed within the Russian Empire for much of the preceding century, Russian nationalists risked creating a chaotic, discontented eastern province, dangerously close to the imperial capital. The “Russia’s Ireland” motif became so prominent in the following eight years – before Finland got independence in 1917 – as to become an international cliché. The discourse of imperial subjugation that existed in both Ireland and Finland in the first decade of the twentieth century has rather obscured the fact that, despite obvious superficial parallels, the nineteenth century experiences of these nations differed considerably. Both Finland and Ireland were part of larger imperial systems in the nineteenth century, and national movements developed in both countries that sought to develop political, economic and cultural autonomy. Finland became a regularly-employed model for Irish national aspirations, but the analogy was rejected consistently, and often vigorously, by Finns in the nineteenth century. This article charts the development of the Finnish-Irish constitutional analogy from the middle of the nineteenth century to the eve of both nations’ independence. It demonstrates that despite the similarities in overall historical timelines, contemporaries perceived differences between the two cases.

KW - 615 History and Archaeology

U2 - 10.1017/ihs.2017.31

DO - 10.1017/ihs.2017.31

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 186

EP - 205

JO - Irish Historical Studies

JF - Irish Historical Studies

SN - 0021-1214

IS - 160

ER -