Commentary: Versioning and structural change

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKirjan luku tai artikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Tommaso Venturini makes many claims in this provocative chapter, which focus mostly on three themes. First, there are arguments about the micro-macro distinction and its consequences for understanding social phenomena. I think Venturini has misunderstood the distinction and its purpose. The second theme is Venturini’s observations about social scientific models and their shortcomings in understanding social change. I think here Venturini has identified some real limitations of current models, but he is not successful in diagnosing the reason for them. Finally, there are his suggestions about the possibilities of versioning in understanding social change. I think this is the most interesting part of the chapter, although I see the potential of versioning quite differently. In the following commentary, I will say something on each of these three themes.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
OtsikkoContemporary Philosophy and Social Science : An Interdisciplinary Dialogue
ToimittajatMichiru Nagatsu, Attilia Ruzzene
Sivumäärä6
KustantajaBloomsbury academic
Julkaisupäivä30 toukokuuta 2019
Sivut231-236
ISBN (painettu)9781474248754
ISBN (elektroninen) 9781474248761 , 9781474248778
TilaJulkaistu - 30 toukokuuta 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa

Tieteenalat

  • 5141 Sosiologia
  • 611 Filosofia

Lainaa tätä

Ylikoski, P. K. (2019). Commentary: Versioning and structural change. teoksessa M. Nagatsu, & A. Ruzzene (Toimittajat), Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue (Sivut 231-236). Bloomsbury academic.
Ylikoski, Petri K. / Commentary: Versioning and structural change. Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Toimittaja / Michiru Nagatsu ; Attilia Ruzzene. Bloomsbury academic, 2019. Sivut 231-236
@inbook{f839e1703e0d47b3ac998cabf10f48a0,
title = "Commentary: Versioning and structural change",
abstract = "Tommaso Venturini makes many claims in this provocative chapter, which focus mostly on three themes. First, there are arguments about the micro-macro distinction and its consequences for understanding social phenomena. I think Venturini has misunderstood the distinction and its purpose. The second theme is Venturini’s observations about social scientific models and their shortcomings in understanding social change. I think here Venturini has identified some real limitations of current models, but he is not successful in diagnosing the reason for them. Finally, there are his suggestions about the possibilities of versioning in understanding social change. I think this is the most interesting part of the chapter, although I see the potential of versioning quite differently. In the following commentary, I will say something on each of these three themes.",
keywords = "5141 Sociology, 611 Philosophy",
author = "Ylikoski, {Petri K}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "30",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781474248754",
pages = "231--236",
editor = "Michiru Nagatsu and Attilia Ruzzene",
booktitle = "Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science",
publisher = "Bloomsbury academic",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Ylikoski, PK 2019, Commentary: Versioning and structural change. julkaisussa M Nagatsu & A Ruzzene (toim), Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Bloomsbury academic, Sivut 231-236.

Commentary: Versioning and structural change. / Ylikoski, Petri K.

Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. toim. / Michiru Nagatsu; Attilia Ruzzene. Bloomsbury academic, 2019. s. 231-236.

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKirjan luku tai artikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - CHAP

T1 - Commentary: Versioning and structural change

AU - Ylikoski, Petri K

PY - 2019/5/30

Y1 - 2019/5/30

N2 - Tommaso Venturini makes many claims in this provocative chapter, which focus mostly on three themes. First, there are arguments about the micro-macro distinction and its consequences for understanding social phenomena. I think Venturini has misunderstood the distinction and its purpose. The second theme is Venturini’s observations about social scientific models and their shortcomings in understanding social change. I think here Venturini has identified some real limitations of current models, but he is not successful in diagnosing the reason for them. Finally, there are his suggestions about the possibilities of versioning in understanding social change. I think this is the most interesting part of the chapter, although I see the potential of versioning quite differently. In the following commentary, I will say something on each of these three themes.

AB - Tommaso Venturini makes many claims in this provocative chapter, which focus mostly on three themes. First, there are arguments about the micro-macro distinction and its consequences for understanding social phenomena. I think Venturini has misunderstood the distinction and its purpose. The second theme is Venturini’s observations about social scientific models and their shortcomings in understanding social change. I think here Venturini has identified some real limitations of current models, but he is not successful in diagnosing the reason for them. Finally, there are his suggestions about the possibilities of versioning in understanding social change. I think this is the most interesting part of the chapter, although I see the potential of versioning quite differently. In the following commentary, I will say something on each of these three themes.

KW - 5141 Sociology

KW - 611 Philosophy

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781474248754

SP - 231

EP - 236

BT - Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science

A2 - Nagatsu, Michiru

A2 - Ruzzene, Attilia

PB - Bloomsbury academic

ER -

Ylikoski PK. Commentary: Versioning and structural change. julkaisussa Nagatsu M, Ruzzene A, toimittajat, Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Bloomsbury academic. 2019. s. 231-236