Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation

Ping Xiao, Hannu Toivonen, Oskar Gross, Amilcar Cardoso, João Correia, Penousal Machado, Pedro Martins, Hugo Goncalo Oliveira, Rahul Sharma, Alexandre Miguel Pinto, Alberto Diaz, Virginia Francisco, Pablo Gervás, Raquel Hervas, Carlos León, Jamie Forth, Matthew Purver, Geraint A. Wiggins, Dragana Miljkovic, Vid Podpecan & 8 muut Senja Pollak, Jan Kralj, Martin Znidarsic, Marko Bohanec, Nada Lavrač, Tanja Urbancic, Frank Van Der Velde, Stuart Battersby

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Computational creativity seeks to understand computational mechanisms that can be characterized as creative. The creation of new concepts is a central challenge for any creative system. In this article, we outline different approaches to computational concept creation and then review conceptual representations relevant to concept creation, and therefore to computational creativity. The conceptual representations are organized in accordance with two important perspectives on the distinctions between them. One distinction is between symbolic, spatial and connectionist representations. The other is between descriptive and procedural representations. Additionally, conceptual representations used in particular creative domains, such as language, music, image and emotion, are reviewed separately. For every representation reviewed, we cover the inference it affords, the computational means of building it, and its application in concept creation.

Alkuperäiskielienglanti
Artikkeli9
LehtiACM Computing Surveys
Vuosikerta52
Numero1
Sivumäärä33
ISSN0360-0300
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - helmikuuta 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 113 Tietojenkäsittely- ja informaatiotieteet

Lainaa tätä

Xiao, P., Toivonen, H., Gross, O., Cardoso, A., Correia, J., Machado, P., ... Battersby, S. (2019). Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(1), [9]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3186729
Xiao, Ping ; Toivonen, Hannu ; Gross, Oskar ; Cardoso, Amilcar ; Correia, João ; Machado, Penousal ; Martins, Pedro ; Goncalo Oliveira, Hugo ; Sharma, Rahul ; Pinto, Alexandre Miguel ; Diaz, Alberto ; Francisco, Virginia ; Gervás, Pablo ; Hervas, Raquel ; León, Carlos ; Forth, Jamie ; Purver, Matthew ; Wiggins, Geraint A. ; Miljkovic, Dragana ; Podpecan, Vid ; Pollak, Senja ; Kralj, Jan ; Znidarsic, Martin ; Bohanec, Marko ; Lavrač, Nada ; Urbancic, Tanja ; Van Der Velde, Frank ; Battersby, Stuart. / Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation. Julkaisussa: ACM Computing Surveys. 2019 ; Vuosikerta 52, Nro 1.
@article{1542d42210414703bc0200dfba97a4fd,
title = "Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation",
abstract = "Computational creativity seeks to understand computational mechanisms that can be characterized as creative. The creation of new concepts is a central challenge for any creative system. In this article, we outline different approaches to computational concept creation and then review conceptual representations relevant to concept creation, and therefore to computational creativity. The conceptual representations are organized in accordance with two important perspectives on the distinctions between them. One distinction is between symbolic, spatial and connectionist representations. The other is between descriptive and procedural representations. Additionally, conceptual representations used in particular creative domains, such as language, music, image and emotion, are reviewed separately. For every representation reviewed, we cover the inference it affords, the computational means of building it, and its application in concept creation.",
keywords = "113 Computer and information sciences, Computational Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, Computational creativity, concept creation, concept, conceptual representation, procedural representation",
author = "Ping Xiao and Hannu Toivonen and Oskar Gross and Amilcar Cardoso and Jo{\~a}o Correia and Penousal Machado and Pedro Martins and {Goncalo Oliveira}, Hugo and Rahul Sharma and Pinto, {Alexandre Miguel} and Alberto Diaz and Virginia Francisco and Pablo Gerv{\'a}s and Raquel Hervas and Carlos Le{\'o}n and Jamie Forth and Matthew Purver and Wiggins, {Geraint A.} and Dragana Miljkovic and Vid Podpecan and Senja Pollak and Jan Kralj and Martin Znidarsic and Marko Bohanec and Nada Lavrač and Tanja Urbancic and {Van Der Velde}, Frank and Stuart Battersby",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1145/3186729",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
journal = "ACM Computing Surveys",
issn = "0360-0300",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
number = "1",

}

Xiao, P, Toivonen, H, Gross, O, Cardoso, A, Correia, J, Machado, P, Martins, P, Goncalo Oliveira, H, Sharma, R, Pinto, AM, Diaz, A, Francisco, V, Gervás, P, Hervas, R, León, C, Forth, J, Purver, M, Wiggins, GA, Miljkovic, D, Podpecan, V, Pollak, S, Kralj, J, Znidarsic, M, Bohanec, M, Lavrač, N, Urbancic, T, Van Der Velde, F & Battersby, S 2019, 'Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation', ACM Computing Surveys, Vuosikerta 52, Nro 1, 9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3186729

Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation. / Xiao, Ping; Toivonen, Hannu; Gross, Oskar; Cardoso, Amilcar; Correia, João; Machado, Penousal; Martins, Pedro; Goncalo Oliveira, Hugo; Sharma, Rahul; Pinto, Alexandre Miguel; Diaz, Alberto; Francisco, Virginia; Gervás, Pablo; Hervas, Raquel; León, Carlos; Forth, Jamie; Purver, Matthew; Wiggins, Geraint A.; Miljkovic, Dragana; Podpecan, Vid; Pollak, Senja; Kralj, Jan; Znidarsic, Martin; Bohanec, Marko; Lavrač, Nada; Urbancic, Tanja; Van Der Velde, Frank; Battersby, Stuart.

julkaisussa: ACM Computing Surveys, Vuosikerta 52, Nro 1, 9, 02.2019.

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual Representations for Computational Concept Creation

AU - Xiao, Ping

AU - Toivonen, Hannu

AU - Gross, Oskar

AU - Cardoso, Amilcar

AU - Correia, João

AU - Machado, Penousal

AU - Martins, Pedro

AU - Goncalo Oliveira, Hugo

AU - Sharma, Rahul

AU - Pinto, Alexandre Miguel

AU - Diaz, Alberto

AU - Francisco, Virginia

AU - Gervás, Pablo

AU - Hervas, Raquel

AU - León, Carlos

AU - Forth, Jamie

AU - Purver, Matthew

AU - Wiggins, Geraint A.

AU - Miljkovic, Dragana

AU - Podpecan, Vid

AU - Pollak, Senja

AU - Kralj, Jan

AU - Znidarsic, Martin

AU - Bohanec, Marko

AU - Lavrač, Nada

AU - Urbancic, Tanja

AU - Van Der Velde, Frank

AU - Battersby, Stuart

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Computational creativity seeks to understand computational mechanisms that can be characterized as creative. The creation of new concepts is a central challenge for any creative system. In this article, we outline different approaches to computational concept creation and then review conceptual representations relevant to concept creation, and therefore to computational creativity. The conceptual representations are organized in accordance with two important perspectives on the distinctions between them. One distinction is between symbolic, spatial and connectionist representations. The other is between descriptive and procedural representations. Additionally, conceptual representations used in particular creative domains, such as language, music, image and emotion, are reviewed separately. For every representation reviewed, we cover the inference it affords, the computational means of building it, and its application in concept creation.

AB - Computational creativity seeks to understand computational mechanisms that can be characterized as creative. The creation of new concepts is a central challenge for any creative system. In this article, we outline different approaches to computational concept creation and then review conceptual representations relevant to concept creation, and therefore to computational creativity. The conceptual representations are organized in accordance with two important perspectives on the distinctions between them. One distinction is between symbolic, spatial and connectionist representations. The other is between descriptive and procedural representations. Additionally, conceptual representations used in particular creative domains, such as language, music, image and emotion, are reviewed separately. For every representation reviewed, we cover the inference it affords, the computational means of building it, and its application in concept creation.

KW - 113 Computer and information sciences

KW - Computational Creativity

KW - Artificial Intelligence

KW - Computational creativity

KW - concept creation

KW - concept

KW - conceptual representation

KW - procedural representation

U2 - 10.1145/3186729

DO - 10.1145/3186729

M3 - Article

VL - 52

JO - ACM Computing Surveys

JF - ACM Computing Surveys

SN - 0360-0300

IS - 1

M1 - 9

ER -