Constitutional Mentality

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKirjan luku tai artikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Kuvaus

Nordic Constitutions have both differences and similarities. This chapter explains certain key differences by reflecting legal-cultural and historical dimensions of living Nordic constitutional law. The underlying idea is to offer a thematic and comparative overview for a non-Nordic reader. First, the general comparative context of Nordic constitutions is explained shortly. Secondly, chosen key feature of each constitution is thematically highlighted. In Finland’s case, the focus is on the role of the parliament’s Constitutional Committee as the guardian of constitutionality. When it comes to Sweden, the focus is on the exceptionally central position of its parliament. Section for Norway explains the central role of the Supreme Court. Discussion on Denmark centres on national sovereignty. In the case of Iceland, the new creative manner of reforming constitution is addressed. Final section speaks of the Nordic experience – or “Nordicness” – and questions its future in the world of expanding judicial review.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
OtsikkoNordic Law in European Context
ToimittajatPia Letto-Vanamo, Ditlev Tamm, Bent Ole Gram Mortensen
Sivumäärä20
JulkaisupaikkaCham
KustantajaSpringer
Julkaisupäivätammikuuta 2019
Sivut41-60
ISBN (painettu)978-3-030-03005-6
ISBN (elektroninen)978-3-030-03006-3
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - tammikuuta 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa

Julkaisusarja

NimiIus Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
KustantajaSpringer
Vuosikerta73
ISSN (painettu)1534-6781
ISSN (elektroninen)2214-9902

Tieteenalat

  • 513 Oikeustiede

Lainaa tätä

Husa, V. J. M. (2019). Constitutional Mentality. teoksessa P. Letto-Vanamo, D. Tamm, & B. O. G. Mortensen (Toimittajat), Nordic Law in European Context (Sivut 41-60). (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice; Vuosikerta 73). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03006-3_3
Husa, Veikko Jaakko Mikael. / Constitutional Mentality. Nordic Law in European Context. Toimittaja / Pia Letto-Vanamo ; Ditlev Tamm ; Bent Ole Gram Mortensen. Cham : Springer, 2019. Sivut 41-60 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice).
@inbook{439b01401ebf4fcf9981dbb12f8281ce,
title = "Constitutional Mentality",
abstract = "Nordic Constitutions have both differences and similarities. This chapter explains certain key differences by reflecting legal-cultural and historical dimensions of living Nordic constitutional law. The underlying idea is to offer a thematic and comparative overview for a non-Nordic reader. First, the general comparative context of Nordic constitutions is explained shortly. Secondly, chosen key feature of each constitution is thematically highlighted. In Finland’s case, the focus is on the role of the parliament’s Constitutional Committee as the guardian of constitutionality. When it comes to Sweden, the focus is on the exceptionally central position of its parliament. Section for Norway explains the central role of the Supreme Court. Discussion on Denmark centres on national sovereignty. In the case of Iceland, the new creative manner of reforming constitution is addressed. Final section speaks of the Nordic experience – or “Nordicness” – and questions its future in the world of expanding judicial review.",
keywords = "513 Law, Nordic law, constitutional law, legal mentality",
author = "Husa, {Veikko Jaakko Mikael}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-03006-3_3",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-03005-6",
series = "Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "41--60",
editor = "Pia Letto-Vanamo and Ditlev Tamm and Mortensen, {Bent Ole Gram}",
booktitle = "Nordic Law in European Context",
address = "International",

}

Husa, VJM 2019, Constitutional Mentality. julkaisussa P Letto-Vanamo, D Tamm & BOG Mortensen (toim), Nordic Law in European Context. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, Vuosikerta 73, Springer, Cham, Sivut 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03006-3_3

Constitutional Mentality. / Husa, Veikko Jaakko Mikael.

Nordic Law in European Context. toim. / Pia Letto-Vanamo; Ditlev Tamm; Bent Ole Gram Mortensen. Cham : Springer, 2019. s. 41-60 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice; Vuosikerta 73).

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaKirjan luku tai artikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

TY - CHAP

T1 - Constitutional Mentality

AU - Husa, Veikko Jaakko Mikael

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Nordic Constitutions have both differences and similarities. This chapter explains certain key differences by reflecting legal-cultural and historical dimensions of living Nordic constitutional law. The underlying idea is to offer a thematic and comparative overview for a non-Nordic reader. First, the general comparative context of Nordic constitutions is explained shortly. Secondly, chosen key feature of each constitution is thematically highlighted. In Finland’s case, the focus is on the role of the parliament’s Constitutional Committee as the guardian of constitutionality. When it comes to Sweden, the focus is on the exceptionally central position of its parliament. Section for Norway explains the central role of the Supreme Court. Discussion on Denmark centres on national sovereignty. In the case of Iceland, the new creative manner of reforming constitution is addressed. Final section speaks of the Nordic experience – or “Nordicness” – and questions its future in the world of expanding judicial review.

AB - Nordic Constitutions have both differences and similarities. This chapter explains certain key differences by reflecting legal-cultural and historical dimensions of living Nordic constitutional law. The underlying idea is to offer a thematic and comparative overview for a non-Nordic reader. First, the general comparative context of Nordic constitutions is explained shortly. Secondly, chosen key feature of each constitution is thematically highlighted. In Finland’s case, the focus is on the role of the parliament’s Constitutional Committee as the guardian of constitutionality. When it comes to Sweden, the focus is on the exceptionally central position of its parliament. Section for Norway explains the central role of the Supreme Court. Discussion on Denmark centres on national sovereignty. In the case of Iceland, the new creative manner of reforming constitution is addressed. Final section speaks of the Nordic experience – or “Nordicness” – and questions its future in the world of expanding judicial review.

KW - 513 Law

KW - Nordic law

KW - constitutional law

KW - legal mentality

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-03006-3_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-03006-3_3

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-030-03005-6

T3 - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice

SP - 41

EP - 60

BT - Nordic Law in European Context

A2 - Letto-Vanamo, Pia

A2 - Tamm, Ditlev

A2 - Mortensen, Bent Ole Gram

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -

Husa VJM. Constitutional Mentality. julkaisussa Letto-Vanamo P, Tamm D, Mortensen BOG, toimittajat, Nordic Law in European Context. Cham: Springer. 2019. s. 41-60. (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03006-3_3