Does postoperative orbital volume predict postoperative globe malposition after blow-out fracture reconstruction? A 6-month clinical follow-up study

Johanna Snäll, M. Narjus-Sterba, M. Toivari, T. Wilkman, H. Thoren

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between intraorbital volume change caused by orbital fracture and globe malposition (GMP) in blow-out fracture patients undergoing surgery and to clarify the significance of different radiologically detected predictors associated with GMP.Patients and methodsA 6-month prospective follow-up study of unilateral isolated orbital fractures was designed and implemented. The main outcome variable was GMP (present or absent); the secondary outcome was orientation of GMP (horizontal or vertical). The primary predictor variable was postoperative orbital volume difference determined as the difference between the fractured and non-fractured orbit (measured in milliliter and analyzed in milliliter and percentages). The explanatory variables were gender, age, treatment delay from trauma to surgery, fracture site, horizontal depth of the fracture, fracture area, maximum vertical dislocation of the fracture, and preoperative volume difference.ResultsA total of 15 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were followed for 6months from a larger cohort. GMP was detected in 6/15 patients (40.0%). GMP was more often present in large (2.5cm(2)) fractures (55.6%), in combined orbital fractures (50.0%), and in fractures with preoperative volume difference 2.5ml (62.5%) regardless of the postoperative volume correction. Postoperatively, patients with and without GMP displayed overcorrection of orbital volume; 4.15% corresponded to 1.15ml (with GMP) and 7.6% corresponded to 1.9ml (without GMP).ConclusionGMP was present in large and combined orbital fractures. Clinically detectable postoperative GMP occurred despite satisfactory orbital reconstruction and overcorrection. Mild GMP, however, is not significant for the patient.

Alkuperäiskielienglanti
LehtiOral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Vuosikerta23
Numero1
Sivut27-34
Sivumäärä8
ISSN1865-1550
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - maalisk. 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 313 Hammaslääketieteet
  • 3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologia

Siteeraa tätä