External quality assessment of orthohantavirus and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus molecular detection and serology in Europe, 2021

Mert Erdin, Kemalia R Stanoeva, Ramona Mögling, Misa Korva, Natasa Knap, Katarina Resman Rus, Cristina Domingo, Johan HJ Reimerink, Ankje de Vries, Hussein Abas Thamer Alburkat, Mira Utriainen, Celine M Gossner, Tarja Sironen, Tatjana Avsic-Zupanc, Chantal Bem Reusken, Olli Vapalahti

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkelijulkaisuArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

Background: Rodent-borne viruses such as orthohan-taviruses and arenaviruses cause considerable dis-ease burden with regional and temporal differences in incidence and clinical awareness. Therefore, it is important to regularly evaluate laboratory diagnos-tic capabilities, e.g. by external quality assessments (EQA). Aim: We wished to evaluate the performance and diagnostic capability of European expert labora-tories to detect orthohantaviruses and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and human antibody response towards orthohantaviruses. Methods: We conducted an EQA in 2021; molecular panels consisted of 12 samples, including different orthohantaviruses (Seoul, Dobrava-Belgrade (DOBV), Puumala (PUUV) and Hantaan orthohantavirus), LCMV and negative controls. Serological panels consisted of six human serum samples reactive to PUUV, DOBV or negative to orthohantaviruses. The EQA was sent to 25 laborato-ries in 20 countries. Results: The accuracy of molecu-lar detection of orthohantaviruses varied (50-67%, average 62%) among 16 participating laboratories, while LCMV samples were successfully detected in all 11 participating laboratories (91-100%, average 96%). The accuracy of serological diagnosis of acute and past orthohantavirus infections was on average 95% among 20 participating laboratories and 82% in 19 laboratories, respectively. A variety of methods was used, with predominance of in-house assays for molecular tests, and commercial assays for serological ones. Conclusion: Serology, the most common tool to diagnose acute orthohantavirus infections, had a high accuracy in this EQA. The molecular detection of orthohantaviruses needs improvement while LCMV detection (performed in fewer laboratories) had 95% accuracy. Further EQAs are recommended to be per-formed periodically to monitor improvements and challenges in the diagnostics of rodent-borne diseases.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
Artikkeli2300054
LehtiEurosurveillance
Vuosikerta28
Numero40
Sivumäärä10
ISSN1025-496X
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 5 lokak. 2023
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä, vertaisarvioitu

Tieteenalat

  • 11832 Mikrobiologia ja virologia
  • 3111 Biolääketieteet

Siteeraa tätä